Grok responds to the query: "What evidence from the newly released JFK files suggests that Cuba may have been involved in the assassination?"

https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_ce3e022c-33f5-43d6-aa66-b34b3edd0339

 The newly released JFK files from March 18, 2025, provide several pieces of evidence and context that suggest a possible Cuban involvement in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, though the information is often circumstantial, speculative, or deliberately obscured by the CIA and other U.S. officials. Let’s break this down based on the documents provided, while also critically examining the narrative and highlighting surprising elements that challenge the official story of Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone.

Evidence Suggesting Cuban Involvement

1. CIA Evidence of Cuban Retaliation
   The document 157-10014-10242 reveals that after JFK’s assassination on November 22, 1963, the CIA received evidence suggesting that Cuban Premier Fidel Castro may have orchestrated the killing as retaliation for CIA attempts on his life. This is a significant claim because it directly implicates Castro, and the CIA’s possession of such evidence immediately after the assassination raises questions about why this wasn’t thoroughly investigated or shared with the Warren Commission. The document notes that the CIA withheld this information for two reasons: to conceal their own recruitment of Mafia mobsters to assassinate Castro and to prevent public outrage that might lead to "reckless actions." This cover-up suggests that the CIA believed the evidence was credible enough to warrant suppression, which indirectly lends weight to the possibility of Cuban involvement.
2. Oswald’s Visit to the Cuban Embassy
   In the same file 157-10014-10242, Fidel Castro, in an interview with Frank Mankiewicz and Kirby Jones, notes that Lee Harvey Oswald visited the Cuban embassy in Mexico City a few months prior to the assassination to obtain a travel permit to Cuba, which was denied. Castro speculates that Oswald’s actions might have been an attempt to implicate Cuba, suggesting a broader conspiracy by U.S. reactionaries. While Castro denies involvement, the fact of Oswald’s visit to the Cuban embassy is a concrete link between the assassin and Cuba. This raises the possibility that Oswald may have been influenced, manipulated, or even directed by Cuban agents—or that someone wanted it to appear that way. The timing of the visit, just months before the assassination, is suspicious and suggests a potential Cuban connection, even if it was staged to frame Cuba.
3. Immediate Post-Assassination Intelligence from Mexico City
   The file 157-10014-10242 also states that within hours of JFK’s death, the U.S. embassy in Mexico City cabled information suggesting Cuban involvement, which was corroborated by CIA findings in Washington. This rapid emergence of intelligence pointing to Cuba is striking. While CIA Director John A. McCone claimed that Castro’s name was not mentioned during his three-hour meeting with Robert F. Kennedy immediately after the shooting, the next day McCone briefed President Lyndon B. Johnson on the Mexico City intelligence. The fact that this information was not shared with the Warren Commission further fuels suspicion. If the intelligence was baseless, why was it withheld? The suppression suggests that U.S. officials may have believed there was a real Cuban link but chose to bury it to avoid escalating tensions during the Cold War.
4. The AM/LASH Operation and Timing
   Another document, also 157-10014-10242, notes that at the very hour JFK was shot, a former Castro supporter, code-named AM/LASH (identified as Rolando Cuebala, now imprisoned in Cuba), was receiving a poison pen from a CIA agent as part of an ongoing anti-Castro effort. This timing is extraordinary and suggests a possible connection. If Cuban intelligence was aware of the CIA’s continued assassination attempts against Castro—such as this one involving AM/LASH—they might have had a motive to retaliate. The simultaneity of JFK’s assassination and the AM/LASH operation could indicate that Cuba, anticipating further attempts on Castro’s life, decided to strike first. Alternatively, it might suggest that elements within the CIA or anti-Castro groups orchestrated JFK’s death to make it look like Cuban retaliation, knowing the AM/LASH operation could be used to point fingers at Castro.
5. Cuban Financing of Subversive Activities in Latin America
   Documents 177-10002-10016 and 176-10036-10065 detail Cuban financing of subversive operations across Latin America, including in Venezuela, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Brazil, during 1961–1963. These operations involved cash couriers, bank transfers, and diplomatic channels to fund guerrilla activities, often with ties to Communist groups. For example, in Brazil, a guerrilla trained in Cuba was caught with ammunition funded by Communist China via Cuba, showing Cuba’s role as a conduit for revolutionary activities. While these documents don’t directly link Cuba to JFK’s assassination, they establish a pattern of Cuban support for subversive and violent operations in the Western Hemisphere during the same period. This context makes it plausible that Cuba could have extended its operations to target a high-profile figure like JFK, especially given the CIA’s repeated attempts to kill Castro.

Surprising Information and Critical Analysis

• CIA-Mafia Collaboration and Cover-Up
  A surprising revelation in 157-10014-10242 is the extent of the CIA’s collaboration with the Mafia to assassinate Castro, involving figures like John Rosselli, and the deliberate withholding of this information from the Warren Commission. Key figures like Robert F. Kennedy, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, and CIA Director Allen W. Dulles (a Warren Commission member) knew of the plot but kept silent. This cover-up is shocking because it suggests that the U.S. government was more concerned with hiding its own illicit activities than fully investigating JFK’s death. The CIA’s fear that revealing the Castro retaliation evidence might “inflame the American people” indicates they believed the evidence was credible, which challenges the official narrative of Oswald acting alone.
• Robert F. Kennedy’s Role
  Robert F. Kennedy’s involvement is particularly surprising. In 157-10014-10242, he was briefed on the CIA-Mafia plot on May 7, 1962, and cautioned the CIA against proceeding without his approval. He also informed Hoover of the plot but did not disclose it to the Warren Commission. As JFK’s brother and a key overseer of CIA activities, his silence is troubling. It suggests either complicity in the cover-up or a belief that the Cuban angle was too dangerous to pursue publicly, possibly due to Cold War tensions and the risk of war with Cuba and the Soviet Union.
• Plausible Deniability and White House Knowledge
  The same file notes that a high-level CIA official testified that the White House was likely briefed on the Castro assassination plots through “plausible deniability,” using vague language to shield the President from accountability. This practice, as described in a Senate report, allowed senior officials to deny knowledge of operations if they were exposed. This raises the question: if JFK was unaware of the plots, as his advisers claimed, who authorized them? The use of plausible deniability suggests a deeper level of secrecy and potential rogue elements within the CIA, which could have contributed to a conspiracy involving Cuba—either as a perpetrator or a scapegoat.
• The Official Narrative vs. the Evidence
  The official narrative, established by the Warren Commission, holds that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating JFK. However, the newly released files challenge this conclusion. The CIA’s evidence of Cuban retaliation, Oswald’s visit to the Cuban embassy, the Mexico City intelligence, and the timing of the AM/LASH operation all point to a possible Cuban connection that was never fully explored. The deliberate suppression of this information by the CIA, Robert F. Kennedy, and others suggests that the official narrative may have been shaped to avoid a confrontation with Cuba and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, rather than to reflect the full truth.

Conclusion

The newly released JFK files provide several pieces of evidence suggesting Cuban involvement in the assassination: the CIA’s immediate post-assassination evidence of Castro’s retaliation, Oswald’s visit to the Cuban embassy, intelligence from Mexico City, the timing of the AM/LASH operation, and Cuba’s documented support for subversive activities in Latin America. However, this evidence is largely circumstantial and speculative, and the CIA’s cover-up of its own actions complicates the picture. The suppression of information by key figures like Robert F. Kennedy and the CIA indicates that there may have been a concerted effort to bury the Cuban angle, either to protect U.S. interests or to hide a more complex conspiracy involving anti-Castro elements, the Mafia, or even rogue CIA operatives. These revelations challenge the official narrative of Oswald acting alone and suggest that the full truth about JFK’s assassination remains elusive.

Grok 3 Enabled

You have the most powerful model available