Friday, September 27, 2024

The case of the German tourist who went missing: A mystery partially solved

Body of German tourist found 24 years later in Cuba.

Claudia von Weiss de Venegas

Eleven years ago this blog highlighted the case of a German woman who went missing in Cuba, and followed up a year later in 2014. Her name was Claudia von Weiss de Venegas.

Husband and wife: Miguel de Venegas, Claudia von Weiss de Venegas

On November 20, 1999 Claudia von Weiss de Venegas, disappeared while on holiday in Cuba. She left the hotel on a bicycle with $500 and was never heard from again. Her husband, Miguel de Venegas, circulated fliers about his missing wife in Cuba and for his troubles was expelled from the country. Ten years later in a Hamburg news publication, Claudia's case resurfaced and her fate remains unknown but Miguel hopes one day to find out what had happened to his wife, but he has given up on finding her alive.  

Her grave was apparently discovered in Cuba in December 2023, and an undertaker who buried her 24 years ago confirmed her identity, but Cuban officials barred an exhumation to confirm dental records, and DNA according to the report below.

Earlier this year Dark Curiosities provided an overview of Claudia's case, and the mystery that still surrounds it.

 

Sunday, September 15, 2024

Call for solidarity with protesters in Iran marking two years since Mahsa Amini was beaten to death.

 Please share hashtags: #MahsaAmini #WomanLifeFreedom #IranProtests

Mahsa Amini was beaten to death by morality police in Iran.

Morality police in Iran beat Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish woman, to death for not complying with Tehran's hijab regulations. Mahsa was arrested on September 13, 2022 badly beaten, left in a coma, and she died two years ago today on September 16th.

Mass protests erupted in Iran, the Iranian regime periodically shutdown the internet and carried out massacres, and executions against demonstrators over the past two years.  The world has not forgotten, and songs continue to be sung by artists in remembrance of Mahsa Amini.

Furthermore, the folly of replacing short wave radio transmissions of uncensored news with online broadcasts has been exposed once more, as it was in Egypt during the Arab Spring.  

The last time this happened in Iran was in 2019, when the Mullahs killed 1,500 people, and I didn't know about it. Images of nonviolent marches have dwindled, but some continue to appear, as have tales of the price protestors paid for their bold resistance. Their suppression was successful at the time, but let us do our part to ensure that the repression does not happen again without worldwide condemnation.

Protests were held all around the world today to mourn Mahsa Amini on the eve of her two-year death anniversary. Find out where the protest in her memory will be held closest to you tomorrow.

Please share the messages, videos, and hashtags of this Iranian freedom movement that is also calling out democracies for falling short in their solidarity.

Masih continues to be targeted by the Mullahs for assassination on U.S. soil, and U.S. officials are recommending that she go into witness protection.

Listening to these Iranian activists take to task the Biden Administration for enabling the Iranian oppressors gives me a sense of deja vu.

Dear friends of freedom reading this blog entry, please amplify these Iranian voices, let your elected representatives know that you are watching, and that this is unacceptable.

This has been going on for far too long in Iran, and the terror tactics have been copied elsewhere with Iranian help.

The Basij, formed in 1979 in Iran, murdered nonviolent demonstrators like Neda Agha Soltan in 2009 during the Green Revolution.

Hugo Chavez copied the Basij and formed Colectivos in Venezuela. Both are pro-government militias with long track records of repression and murder. The Colectivos in 2014 did the same thing in Venezuela murdering nonviolent protesters like Génesis Carmona during mass anti-government protests.

Neda Agha-Soltan and Génesis Carmona shot in the head.
 

Note to Western policy makers: the regime's in Iran, Cuba, and Venezuela are not your friends.

Cuba and Iran have regime's with different ideological formations. Cuba has a communist dictatorship run by the Castros since 1959 and Iran has a Islamist regime run by the mullahs since 1979. However they have two things in common: a profound anti-Americanism that portrays the U.S. as the great Satan, and a fossilized revolutionary tradition that systematically denies human rights to their respective peoples. 

 

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani meets with General Raul Castro (2016)

Robin Wright referred to Cuba and Iran as "melancholy twins" in The New Yorker in 2015. They are both state sponsors of terrorism, and Iran has been linked to a mass killing of Jewish people in Argentina. 

Venezuela is an off shoot of the Cuban revolution and shares both its anti-Americanism and warm relations with Tehran.

But beyond their similarities they also have a shared strategic outlook that is hostile to Western democracies.

The late Fidel Castro visited Iran on May 10, 2001, four months before the September 11, 2001 attacks, where he was quoted by the Agence France Presse at the University of Tehran stating that "Iran and Cuba, in cooperation with each other, can bring America to its knees." ... "The U.S. regime is very weak, and we are witnessing this weakness from close up."

Eleven years later on January 12, 2012 in Havana, Cuba the controversial president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, declared "Our positions, versions, interpretations are alike, very close. We have been good friends, we are and will be, and we will be together forever."

Iran sought out asymmetric means to achieve maximum damage against Israel through their proxies Hamas and Hezbollah killing over 1,200 in Israel, sparking a war that threatens to engulf the region.  Tehran's decades long alliance with Cuba cannot and must not be ignored at such a time of peril.

Iran's Ahmadinejad with Fidel Castro and Klansman David Duke
 

Even closer to home, the relationship between the Iranian regime and white supremacists such as David Duke and anti-Semites such as Louis Farrakhan should also be closely examined. 

Nor can we forget the brutal attack against Salman Rushdie here in the United States on August 12, 2022. He suffered stab wounds to the stomach, chest, eye, hand and thigh.

Martin Luther King Jr. was right: Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Therefore:

I stand in solidarity with Iranians standing up for their freedom. They are facing off against the terrorist regime in Tehran that is indiscriminately murdering protesters.

I pledge to continue to amplify their voices and will use the following hashtags.

#MahsaAmini #WomanLifeFreedom #IranProtests  

Hope you will too.


#DemocracyDelivers: International Day of Democracy

 "Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.

- Winston Churchill, 11 November 1947

 

On this the 16th International Day of Democracy it is important to reflect on the continuing work that needs to be done to safeguard democracy and demonstrate to the non-democratic world that democracy delivers. 

Free speech and political discourse are under siege around the world, including in democratic strongholds like the United States. A strong and independent free press, as well as the freedom to engage in open dialogue, are essential components of democracy. In a healthy democracy, disagreements are encouraged, not just tolerated. No one should be silenced for their political views, but rather encouraged to speak up and participate in civil dialogue. On March 21, 2022 the New York Times Opinion/Siena College Poll delivered worrying news on the state of free speech in America.

"Eighty-four percent of Americans say that some Americans not exercising their freedom of speech in everyday situations due to fear of retaliation or harsh criticism is either a very (40%) or somewhat (44%) serious problem, according to a new national New York Times Opinion/Siena College Poll. Over half, 55%, of Americans say that they have held their tongue, that is, not spoken freely over the last year because they were concerned about retaliation or harsh criticism, and compared to 10 years ago by 46-21% Americans are less, rather than more, free to express their viewpoint on politics, and by 35-28% less, rather than more, free to discuss issues of race."

The UNIVERSAL DECLARATION ON DEMOCRACY adopted without a vote* by the Inter-Parliamentary Council at its 161st session in Cairo on September 16,  1997 found that "the state of democracy presupposes freedom of opinion and expression; this right implies freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."   

Democracies need civic education for its citizens, and two aspects of it must be the principles of free expression and developing and maintaining a culture of political tolerance.

Worse still, in places like Cuba that routinely punish free speech, democracy has been absent for 72 years, and political tolerance outlawed. Citizens in these countries also need the help of democracies, and democrats to regain their rights, and expand the number of free nations.

Sir Winston Churchill defended democracy from the twin barbarisms of Nazism and Communism. The British prime minister acknowledged the flaws and shortcomings of democracies, but added that, despite these limits, they are still preferable to the alternatives. He fought a hot war against the Third Reich, and a cold war against the Soviet Union, and helped to preserve freedom and democracy globally for two generations.  The International Day of Democracy is a good day to remember his legacy, and learn from his example.


Democracy has delivered rising living standards, and greater freedom, but it depends on an engaged and well informed citizenry to function. 

Below is the text of the 1997 Universal Declaration on Democracy.

 

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION ON DEMOCRACY

Declaration adopted without a vote* by the Inter-Parliamentary Council at its 161st session
(Cairo, 16 September 1997)


The Inter-Parliamentary Council,

Reaffirming the Inter-Parliamentary Union's commitment to peace and development and convinced that the strengthening of the democratisation process and representative institutions will greatly contribute to attaining this goal,

Reaffirming also the calling and commitment of the Inter-Parliamentary Union to promoting democracy and the establishment of pluralistic systems of representative government in the world, and wishing to strengthen its sustained and multiform action in this field,

Recalling that each State has the sovereign right, freely to choose and develop, in accordance with the will of its people, its own political, social, economic and cultural systems without interference by other States in strict conformity with the United Nations Charter,

Recalling also the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted on 10 December 1948, as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted on 16 December 1966, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination adopted on 21 December 1965 and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women adopted on 18 December 1979,

Recalling further the Declaration on Criteria for Free and Fair Elections which it adopted in March 1994 and in which it confirmed that in any State the authority of the government can derive only from the will of the people as expressed in genuine, free and fair elections,

Referring to the Agenda for Democratisation presented on 20 December 1996 by the UN Secretary-General to the 51st session of the United Nations General Assembly,

Adopts the following Universal Declaration on Democracy and urges Governments and Parliaments throughout the world to be guided by its content:

FIRST PART - THE PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRACY

1. Democracy is a universally recognised ideal as well as a goal, which is based on common values shared by peoples throughout the world community irrespective of cultural, political, social and economic differences. It is thus a basic right of citizenship to be exercised under conditions of freedom, equality, transparency and responsibility, with due respect for the plurality of views, and in the interest of the polity.

2. Democracy is both an ideal to be pursued and a mode of government to be applied according to modalities which reflect the diversity of experiences and cultural particularities without derogating from internationally recognised principles, norms and standards. It is thus a constantly perfected and always perfectible state or condition whose progress will depend upon a variety of political, social, economic, and cultural factors.

3. As an ideal, democracy aims essentially to preserve and promote the dignity and fundamental rights of the individual, to achieve social justice, foster the economic and social development of the community, strengthen the cohesion of society and enhance national tranquillity, as well as to create a climate that is favourable for international peace. As a form of government, democracy is the best way of achieving these objectives; it is also the only political system that has the capacity for self-correction.

4. The achievement of democracy presupposes a genuine partnership between men and women in the conduct of the affairs of society in which they work in equality and complementarity, drawing mutual enrichment from their differences.

5. A state of democracy ensures that the processes by which power is acceded to, wielded and alternates allow for free political competition and are the product of open, free and non-discriminatory participation by the people, exercised in accordance with the rule of law, in both letter and spirit.

6. Democracy is inseparable from the rights set forth in the international instruments recalled in the preamble. These rights must therefore be applied effectively and their proper exercise must be matched with individual and collective responsibilities.

7. Democracy is founded on the primacy of the law and the exercise of human rights. In a democratic State, no one is above the law and all are equal before the law.

8. Peace and economic, social and cultural development are both conditions for and fruits of democracy. There is thus interdependence between peace, development, respect for and observance of the rule of law and human rights.

SECOND PART - THE ELEMENTS AND EXERCISE OF DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT

9. Democracy is based on the existence of well-structured and well-functioning institutions, as well as on a body of standards and rules and on the will of society as a whole, fully conversant with its rights and responsibilities.

10. It is for democratic institutions to mediate tensions and maintain equilibrium between the competing claims of diversity and uniformity, individuality and collectivity, in order to enhance social cohesion and solidarity.

11. Democracy is founded on the right of everyone to take part in the management of public affairs; it therefore requires the existence of representative institutions at all levels and, in particular, a Parliament in which all components of society are represented and which has the requisite powers and means to express the will of the people by legislating and overseeing government action.

12. The key element in the exercise of democracy is the holding of free and fair elections at regular intervals enabling the people's will to be expressed. These elections must be held on the basis of universal, equal and secret suffrage so that all voters can choose their representatives in conditions of equality, openness and transparency that stimulate political competition. To that end, civil and political rights are essential, and more particularly among them, the rights to vote and to be elected, the rights to freedom of expression and assembly, access to information and the right to organise political parties and carry out political activities. Party organisation, activities, finances, funding and ethics must be properly regulated in an impartial manner in order to ensure the integrity of the democratic processes.

13. It is an essential function of the State to ensure the enjoyment of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights to its citizens. Democracy thus goes hand in hand with an effective, honest and transparent government, freely chosen and accountable for its management of public affairs.

14. Public accountability, which is essential to democracy, applies to all those who hold public authority, whether elected or non-elected, and to all bodies of public authority without exception. Accountability entails a public right of access to information about the activities of government, the right to petition government and to seek redress through impartial administrative and judicial mechanisms.

15. Public life as a whole must be stamped by a sense of ethics and by transparency, and appropriate norms and procedures must be established to uphold them.

16. Individual participation in democratic processes and public life at all levels must be regulated fairly and impartially and must avoid any discrimination, as well as the risk of intimidation by State and non-State actors.

17. Judicial institutions and independent, impartial and effective oversight mechanisms are the guarantors for the rule of law on which democracy is founded. In order for these institutions and mechanisms fully to ensure respect for the rules, improve the fairness of the processes and redress injustices, there must be access by all to administrative and judicial remedies on the basis of equality as well as respect for administrative and judicial decisions both by the organs of the State and representatives of public authority and by each member of society.

18. While the existence of an active civil society is an essential element of democracy, the capacity and willingness of individuals to participate in democratic processes and make governance choices cannot be taken for granted. It is therefore necessary to develop conditions conducive to the genuine exercise of participatory rights, while also eliminating obstacles that prevent, hinder or inhibit this exercise. It is therefore indispensable to ensure the permanent enhancement of, inter alia, equality, transparency and education and to remove obstacles such as ignorance, intolerance, apathy, the lack of genuine choices and alternatives and the absence of measures designed to redress imbalances or discrimination of a social, cultural, religious and racial nature, or for reasons of gender.

19. A sustained state of democracy thus requires a democratic climate and culture constantly nurtured and reinforced by education and other vehicles of culture and information. Hence, a democratic society must be committed to education in the broadest sense of the term, and more particularly civic education and the shaping of a responsible citizenry.

20. Democratic processes are fostered by a favourable economic environment; therefore, in its overall effort for development, society must be committed to satisfying the basic economic needs of the most disadvantaged, thus ensuring their full integration in the democratic process.

21. The state of democracy presupposes freedom of opinion and expression; this right implies freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

22. The institutions and processes of democracy must accommodate the participation of all people in homogeneous as well as heterogeneous societies in order to safeguard diversity, pluralism and the right to be different in a climate of tolerance.

23. Democratic institutions and processes must also foster decentralised local and regional government and administration, which is a right and a necessity, and which makes it possible to broaden the base of public participation.

THIRD PART - THE INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION OF DEMOCRACY

24. Democracy must also be recognised as an international principle, applicable to international organisations and to States in their international relations. The principle of international democracy does not only mean equal or fair representation of States; it also extends to the economic rights and duties of States.

25. The principles of democracy must be applied to the international management of issues of global interest and the common heritage of humankind, in particular the human environment.

26. To preserve international democracy, States must ensure that their conduct conforms to international law, refrain from the use or threat of force and from any conduct that endangers or violates the sovereignty and political or territorial integrity of other States, and take steps to resolve their differences by peaceful means.

27. A democracy should support democratic principles in international relations. In that respect, democracies must refrain from undemocratic conduct, express solidarity with democratic governments and non-State actors like non-governmental organisations which work for democracy and human rights, and extend solidarity to those who are victims of human rights violations at the hands of undemocratic régimes. In order to strengthen international criminal justice, democracies must reject impunity for international crimes and serious violations of fundamental human rights and support the establishment of a permanent international criminal court.

* * *
*After the Declaration was adopted, the delegation of China expressed reservations to the text.
 https://www.ipu.org/our-impact/strong-parliaments/setting-standards/universal-declaration-democracy

Monday, September 9, 2024

Why is Cuba on the state sponsor of terrorism list? Because it continues to sponsor and support terrorism.

“Fidel Castro helped the M-19 in many of its interventions in Colombia. It must even be said that M-19 troops were trained in Cuba, which separated the Cuban government from the Colombian government. Relations were broken,” said Gustavo Petro, a former member of the terrorist group M-19, and today president of Colombia, in 2016.

The State Sponsors of Terrorism list came into existence in 1979, and Cuba was added to the list in 1982 due to its links to the M-19 terrorist group in Colombia, facilitating drug smuggling to the U.S., and providing arms.

Terrorism is a fundamental aspect of Castroism. Fidel Castro, and his fellow revolutionaries, seized power in 1959 through domestic terrorism. Throughout the 1950s, Castro’s July 26th Movement carried out numerous bombings that terrorized and killed Cuban citizens.

The Cuban dictatorship has a track record of sponsoring international terrorism over its entire 65 year rule. This 2024 short documentary “Terrorism: The Cuban Connection” offers some highlights, and this CubaBrief will highlight a few episodes that focus on the United States, Europe and the role played by Cuban diplomats, resulting in their expulsion from France and the United States.

The Failed 1962 Black Friday Plot

Elsa Montero Maldonado and Jose Gomez Abad, a husband and wife team, Roberto Santiesteban Casanova, an attache at the Cuba Mission to the United Nations in New York City, diplomats who in reality were State Security agents, along with Antonio Sueiro and Jose Garcia Orellana, plotted to murder large numbers of New Yorkers  in a planned terrorist attack on the Friday after Thanksgiving in 1962, detonating 500 kilos of explosives inside Macy’s, Gimbel’s, Bloomingdale’s and Manhattan’s Grand Central Terminal.

Cuban diplomats Elsa Montera Maldonado and Jose Gomez Abad, a husband and wife team at the Cuba Mission in NYC.

 

Fortunately, the FBI discovered the plot and prevented what would have been a significant loss of life. Both Elsa Montero Maldonado and Jose Gomez Abad were expelled for their role in the planned terrorist attack. Roberto Santiesteban Casanova,  Antonio Sueiro, and Jose Garcia Orellana were prosecuted, and later traded for Americans jailed in Cuba.


Three suspects, and their weapons stash.

Carlos and the Tricontinental

Havana would go on to redouble its efforts to improve its capacity to promote and carry out terrorist attacks around the world. The Tricontinental Conference, held in Havana from January 3-16, 1966, and the establishment of the Organization for the Solidarity of the Peoples of Asia, Africa, and Latin America OSPAAL sought to support and train terrorist groups worldwide, including in the United States.

Havana would go on to have “successes”.

One of them was a young Venezuelan named after the Soviet Union’s founding leader, Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, also known as Vladimir Lenin.
Ilyich Ramírez Sánchez (age 17) attended the 1966 Tricontinental Conference. Afterwards, Ilyich spent the summer at Camp Matanzas, a guerrilla warfare school run by the Cuban DGI.  Following a string of terrorist attacks across Europe, he picked the alias “Carlos.

Nan Robertson in a special to The New York Times on July 11, 1975 published the article “FRANCE EXPELLING 3 CUBAN OFFICIALS” that reports on the link between Cuban diplomats and Carlos the Jackal.

“France expelled three high‐ranking Cuban diplomats today in connection with the worldwide search for a man called Carlos, who is believed to be an important link in an international terrorist network.” […]”The French Interior Ministry said that investigators were convinced that the terrorist network had been helped significantly by the intelligence services of “certain nations.”[…] French authorities have also said that Carlos may have been directly involved with a siege at the French Embassy in The Hague last September and a grenade attack the same month on Le Drugstore on the Left Bank here, in which 3 persons were killed and 22 wounded.  France expelled three high‐ranking Cuban diplomats on July 10, 1975. ”The Cubans, according to the French Interior Ministry, were “constant visitors” to the Paris hideout of Carlos”. The Cuban diplomats on whom expulsion orders were served today were Raul Rodriguez Sainz, 32 years old, first secretary for cultural affairs; Pedro Lara Zamora, 33, deputy cultural attache, and Ernesto Reyes Herrera, 32, the chief of protocol. André Mousset, spokesman for the Interior Ministry, added that the Carlos affair was looking more and more like an “international terrorist plot.”

FALN Terrorists backed by Cuba, and the bombing campaign in New York City

 

Six months earlier on the other side of the Atlantic another group of Puerto Rican terrorists linked to Havana carried out an act of terrorism that claimed the lives of New Yorkers.

The FALN was responsible for the January 24, 1975 explosion at Fraunces Tavern, which killed Alejandro Berger ( age 28), James Gezork (age 32), Frank Connor (age 33), Harold H. Sherburne (age 66) and wounded over 60 others.


 Zach Dorfman’s June 8, 2017 article “How Fidel Castro Supported Terrorism in America” published in The Wall Street Journal reveals:  “the FALN was started in the mid-1960’s with a nucleus of Puerto Rican terrorists that received advanced training in Cuba. . . . After their advanced training in Cuba they returned to Puerto Rico and a wave of bombings and incendiary incidents struck the [latter] island. Within the last few years they have shifted their activities to the mainland. . . . It is believed that they have maintained close links and may in fact work closely with Cuban intelligence operatives.”

 

Furthermore Mr. Dorfman reported that “[a]ccording to court documents, Filiberto Ojeda Ríos, who is believed to have helped co-found the FALN, told an undercover NYPD officer in 1983 that he had received explosives training in Cuba. And the FBI estimated that by 1973, roughly 135 Puerto Rican militants had received “extensive instruction in guerilla war tactics, preparation of explosive artifacts, and sophisticated methods of sabotage” from Fidel Castro’s intelligence services.”

The Puerto Rican terrorist group, Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional Puertorriqueña, (FALN), from the mid-1970s through the mid-1980s, carried out more than 130 bombings, including more in New York City.

Cuban backed American terrorists carried out attack on the U.S. Capitol in the 1980s.

Windows blown out by bomb placed in the U.S. Capitol in 1983 to protest rout of Cubans in Grenada

The Castro regime aided and abetted American terrorists that attacked and bombed the U.S. capitol, and then doubled down when one of those terrorists died. Radio Havana Cuba, official media of the Castro regime, published in 2010 an article titled “Political Activist Marilyn Buck Dies at 62” in which it referred to Marilyn Buck as an “activist and former political prisoner.” In reality she was a terrorist who bombed the U.S. Capitol in 1983 to protest the Grenada Invasion.

“At two minutes before 11 o’clock in the evening on this day in 1983, a thunderous explosion tore through the second floor of the U.S. Capitol’s Senate wing. Since the area was virtually deserted at the time, there were no casualties. Minutes before the bomb went off, a caller claiming to represent the “Armed Resistance Unit” warned a Capitol switchboard operator that a bomb had been placed near the chamber — purportedly in retaliation for the recent U.S. military actions in Grenada and Lebanon. The force of the device, hidden under a bench outside the Senate chamber, blew the hinges off the door to the office of Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.), the minority leader. It also damaged five paintings, particularly a stately portrait of Massachusetts Sen. Daniel Webster. (The blast tore away Webster’s face and left it scattered across the floor tiles in one-inch canvas shards. Senate officials recovered the fragments from debris-filled trash bins. Over the coming months, a conservator painstakingly restored the painting to a credible, if somewhat diminished, version of the original.) The blast also punched a hole in a partition that sent a shower of pulverized brick, plaster and glass into the Republican cloakroom behind the chamber. Although the explosion caused no structural damage to the Capitol, it shattered mirrors, chandeliers and furniture. Officials placed the damage at $250,000.”

“After a five-year investigation, in May 1988 FBI agents arrested seven members of the ‘Resistance Conspiracy’: Marilyn Jean Buck, Linda Sue Evans, Susan Rosenberg, Timothy Blunk, Alan Berkman, Laura Whitehorn and Elizabeth Ann Duke. They were charged with executing the Capitol bombing as well as triggering similar blasts at Fort McNair and the Washington Navy Yard.”

Two years earlier on October 20, 1981 as part of a group of Weather Underground and Black Liberation Army members assaulted a Brink’s armored car carrying 1.6 million in Nanuet, NY. Buck was a member of the Black Liberation Army. Two police officers and a guard were murdered during the armed robbery and subsequent escape.

Inside of the bombed Senate office.

 

Marilyn Buck pleaded guilty in 1988 to the 1983 bombing of the United States Capitol. Her story is put into context in a long piece published in Politico by William Rosenau titled “The Dark History of America’s First Female Terrorist Group,” which exposes connections to the Cuban dictatorship.

The WASP Network

In 1996 the Cuban Wasp Spy network located in South Florida provided information to Havana that led to the shoot down of two civilian planes in international airspace killing four engaged in the search and rescue of rafters and boat people. This act of state terrorism was widely condemned.


The WASP Network (La Red Avispa) was made up of over forty officers and agents, four escaped to Cuba when the FBI began rounding them up in 1998. Ten were captured, and five of them pleaded guilty and cooperated with the prosecution and became unpersons in Cuba. The Wasp Network engaged in espionage: targeted U.S. military facilities, planned to smuggle arms and explosives into the United States, infiltrated two non-violent exile groups, and carried out numerous other activities to sow division, shape public opinion, meddle in U.S. elections, and provided information for Operation Scorpion that led to the extrajudicial killings of Armando Alejandre, Carlos Costa, Mario de la Peña and Pablo Morales on February 24, 1996. Operation Scorpion was a Cuban intelligence operation of the Castro regime that sought to destroy Brothers to the Rescue using MiG fighters to shoot down their planes in an act of state terrorism carried out over international airspace.

This network also gathered personal information of American military personnel “compiling the names, home addresses, and medical files of the U.S. Southern Command’s top officers and that of hundreds of officers stationed at Boca Chica Naval Station in Key West.”

The spies had received instructions from Havana to burn down an airport hangar, sabotage planes, first terrorize with messages that he was “nearing execution,” then send a mail bomb to kill a CIA agent living in Bal Harbour identified as Jesus Cruza Flor.

On September 12, 1998, the largest Cuban spy ring ever uncovered in the United States, was broken up by the FBI. Ten suspects were charged as Cuban spies. The Cuban dictatorship has spent decades trying to whitewash this history.

WASP network spies captured in 1998.

 

Cuba was taken off the SSOT list in 2015 for political reasons, and returned to it on 2021 for continued bad action.

Cuba was taken off the list of state terror sponsors in 2015 when the Obama Administration, responding to demands of Raul Castro, conducted a politicized review to remove the offending state. Six years later in January 2021, Cuba was returned to the list.

The U.S. State Department at the time cited the following four reasons for re-designating the Cuban dictatorship as a sponsor of terrorism.

1. “Cuba has refused Colombia’s requests to extradite ten ELN leaders living in Havana after the group claimed responsibility for the January 2019 bombing of a Bogota police academy that killed 22 people and injured more than 87 others.”

2. “Cuba also harbors several U.S. fugitives from justice wanted on or convicted of charges of political violence, many of whom have resided in Cuba for decades.  For example, the Cuban regime has refused to return Joanne Chesimard, on the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists List for executing New Jersey State Trooper Werner Foerster in 1973; Ishmael LaBeet, convicted of killing eight people in the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1972; Charles Lee Hill, charged with killing New Mexico state policeman Robert Rosenbloom in 1971; and others.”

3. “Cuba returns to the SST list following its broken commitment to stop supporting terrorism as a condition of its removal by the previous administration in 2015.  On May 13, 2020, the State Department notified Congress that it had certified Cuba under Section 40A(a) of the Arms Export Control Act as “not cooperating fully” with U.S. counterterrorism efforts in 2019.”

4. “In addition to the support for international terrorism that is the basis for today’s action, the Cuban regime engages in a range of malign behavior across the region.  The Cuban intelligence and security apparatus has infiltrated Venezuela’s security and military forces, assisting Nicholas Maduro to maintain his stranglehold over his people while allowing terrorist organizations to operate.  The Cuban government’s support for FARC dissidents and the ELN continues beyond Cuba’s borders as well, and the regime’s support of Maduro has created a permissive environment for international terrorists to live and thrive within Venezuela.”

Backing Hamas supporters and their violent protests in the United States


This CubaBrief is focusing on instances of terrorism carried out in the United States by groups supported by the Cuban dictatorship, and has not touched on Havana’s extensive involvement in terrorism in Latin America and in the Middle East, but their support for Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas has had an impact in the United States. Protests in some cases have turned into riots where, for example, American flags were taken down from Union Station in Washington DC and replaced with Palestinian flags, while Cuban flags were seen in the crowd.

In a formal statement released on October 7, 2023, the same day of the terror attacks, the Cuban Foreign Ministry blamed Israel and its “accomplice,” the United States, for the violence. In doing so, it continued to spread a false narrative that originates in Soviet-era anti-Israel propaganda.In this case Havana was blaming the victims of a terrorist attack that murdered 1,200 and kidnapped hundreds of others perpetrated by their longtime ally Hamas.

On October 8, 2023, one day after Hamas terrorists massacred 1,200 people in southern Israel, militant leftists organized a protest in Times Square to celebrate the killings as an act of resistance and waved signs with anti-Semitic slogans and images. The Center for a Free Cuba took notice of this protest at the time, and how official Cuban media was promoting it. On October 11, 2023, The People’s Forum (TPF) issued a statement defending their October 8th rally in Times Square, doubling down on their support for the terrorist attack.

The group’s co-executive director, Manolo De Los Santos, is a longtime researcher at the Marxist Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research and was “based out of Cuba for many years,” where he “worked toward building international networks of people’s movements and organizations,” according to his biography at the anti-Israel group Black Alliance for Peace. In July 2022, Cuba’s president, Miguel Díaz-Canel, received De los Santos and executive director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research, Vijay Prashad with the aim of “elaborating a new consensus, based on theory and according to the different experiences of social movements and countries, on the path of socialism.”

On January 24, 2024 Manolo De Los Santos spoke the quiet part out loud at The People’s Forum in New York City: “When we finally deal that final blow to destroy Israel. When the state of Israel is finally destroyed and erased from history, that will be the single most important blow we can give to destroying capitalism.”

Biden State Department’s wrong steps on Cuba

Despite this, the Biden State Department removed Cuba from the list of countries not cooperating in the fight against terrorism on May 15, 2024. On the same day Joseph Connor, whose father Frank Connor was murdered in a 1975 terrorist attack in New York City by a Cuban backed group, wrote to Secretary Antony Blinken requesting that one of the terrorists involved in the bombing, who is currently harbored by Havana, be returned to the United States to face justice. Four months later, and Mr. Connor has not received a response.

The reason given by Vedant Patel, the principal deputy spokesperson at the State Department on May 16, 2024 “that the circumstances for Cuba’s certifications as not fully cooperating country have changed from 2022 to 2023” does not stand up to scrutiny. Patel cited “Cuba’s refusal to engage with Colombia on extradition requests for National Liberation Army members supported Cuba’s NFCC certification for 2022.”

What change took place? Not the behavior of the Cuban dictatorship.

The Colombian terrorists harbored by Havana were not extradited. The new duly elected president of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, a past member of the terrorist group M-19 in Colombia with close ties to the Cuban dictatorship, ordered his attorney general to suspend the arrest warrant “against 17 ELN commanders, including those whose extradition Colombia had previously requested from Cuba.” There is also a bit of historical irony. Cuba was first placed on the state sponsor of terrorism list in 1982 when Havana was implicated supplying weapons to the M19 terrorist group from profits raised from trafficking narcotics. Patel also cited that “the U.S. and Cuba resumed law enforcement cooperation in 2023, including on counterterrorism.” First, the phrase “law-enforcement dialogue” is inaccurate. In Cuba, there is no rule of law. “To keep power, the dictatorship maintains a repressive security apparatus that murders nonviolent dissidents extrajudicially. This is not ‘law enforcement.’ The Cuban dictatorship is a transnational threat, and legitimizing it does not enhance U.S. advocacy for human rights.”

What has that meant in practice?

Giving legitimacy to the Cuban dictatorship through this sham “law enforcement cooperation” led Cuban officials meeting with their American counterparts to accuse the United States of “supporting people in Miami plotting ‘terrorist’ actions against Cuba.” Biden administration officials rejected these claims, but the actions of Havana could not be described as a good faith effort, or a reason to cite the dictatorship as fully cooperating in anti-terrorism efforts. Much less grant them access to secure facilities that are of great importance to America’s infrastructure.

On June 18, 2024 the Ways and Means Committee held a hearing on antisemitism on college campuses which denounced that Jewish students were being terrorized.

Former top Cuban Communist Party official granted parole arrives in South Florida through Miami International Airport.

On August 16, 2024, Manuel Menéndez Castellanos, a one time top official in Cuba’s communist party in Cienfuegos, who represented the Cuban dictatorship in international forums, and was given several awards by the regime, arrived in South Florida through Miami International Airport. The former high ranking communist official arrived in Miami through the Cuban Reunification Parole Program.

U.S. Senators send letter to Secretary Blinken over the high risk to national security posed by recent expansion of nonimmigrant visas (NIV) to  Communist Cuba

Despite this lapse, the Biden Administration announced that starting on August 19, 2024 would “expand its visa services to facilitate cultural and educational exchanges between” Cuba and the United States.

On September 5, 2024,  Senator Rick Scott joined Senator Marco Rubio and Senator Ted Cruz “in sending a letter to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, raising concerns over the high risk to national security posed by the Biden-Harris administration’s recent expansion of nonimmigrant visas (NIV) to the communist Cuban regime.” In this letter they point out concerns of this opening to Cuba, a state sponsor of terror (SSOT). ” Given the risks associated with allowing agents of an SSOT to enter the country, it is unclear how the U.S. might benefit from these NIVs.” They also ask some critical questions including, “Has the U.S. government expanded NIVs to the other SSOTs—Iran, North Korea, and Syria? If not, does it plan to do so? Why or why not?”

For more information visit CubaBrief.

 

Sunday, September 8, 2024

Feast Day for Cuba's Our Lady Charity, the founding of the Christian Liberation Movement and the importance of truth

 

Virgin of Charity and the three Juanes

For the past four centuries, since the Virgin of Charity appeared to the three Juanes in the Bay of Nipe in 1612, She has been a source of popular devotion among Cubans and on May 10, 1916 forever linked with Cuban independence when Pope Benedict XV proclaimed Her Patroness of Cuba in response to a request by veterans of the Cuban war of independence. Since then She has also been known as the Virgin Mambisa. Since 1959 She has accompanied the Cuban diaspora.

She has remained a powerful force in Cuba over the past 65 years, despite efforts to impose atheism.

Jesús Mustafá Felipe at Solemn Mass for Our Lady of Charity

36 years ago on September 8, 1988, the Feast Day for Cuba's Our Lady Charity, a handful of Cubans, lay Catholics, consisting of Oswaldo Payá, Ramón Antúnez, Dagoberto Capote, Santiago Cárdenas and Fernando Arvelo, inspired by their faith, the strength of their ideals and love for their country, founded the Christian Liberation Movement (MCL), to work for the recovery of popular sovereignty and national reconciliation in Cuba.

 "Liberation is our purpose, liberation carried out by the people, who will not be a spectator of the moment in which their destiny is decided. We do not call all against each other, but all for a new Cuba. We reject violence, offense, lies and destruction as means of struggle. We do not believe that the end justifies the means. Our goal is to achieve freedom, justice and this is achieved only moved by love. Freedom is true only if it emanates from love. "
Since then, many Cubans joined the Christian Liberation Movement and given their best for their homeland. Some are no longer physically here, and some of them were murdered by the dictatorship.  

Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas described how the Christian Liberation Movement, a democratic opposition movement, came into existence and explained how it was related to the birth of his first child, Oswaldo José.

“When our first child was going to be born, we have three children, we said that our children cannot live in a country without liberty and we are not going to another country to seek freedom. Therefore we have to fight for our children to live free here in Cuba and everyone else's children and their parents too.”    
Oswaldo José was born on February 17, 1988 and the Christian Liberation Movement (MCL) was founded that same year on September 8, 1988.   Oswaldo Payá was killed on July 22, 2012 along with the movement's youth leader Harold Cepero. 

The Castro dictatorship has a hostile relationship with religion since the beginning when it officially declared itself an atheist state and expelled scores of priests from Cuba on September 17, 1961, canceled Christmas in 1969 under the pretext to prevent work shortages for the 1970 ten million ton sugar harvest but continued the ban until 1997, and sent mobs to intimidate Cubans attending religious services.

Priests were taken at gun point and forced out of Cuba in 1961

This is not what was promised by the revolutionaries when they took power in Cuba.  Fidel Castro on January 11, 1959 went  on Face the Nation and promised free, multiparty elections within 18 months. Richard Bate of CBS News pressed the Cuban dictator.

Richard Bate: Dr. Castro you said that in 18 months or so there will be free elections in Cuba. When this time comes will all political parties be able to run candidates in these elections?

Fidel Castro: Yes, of course

Richard Bate: All political parties including the Directorio?

Fidel Castro: Of course, if we don't give free to all the political parties to organize we are not a democratic country. We have fought for the democracy here, and for the free ... for the the freedom of our people. We don't want to stop and to put any difficulties to anybody. We believe in democracy. 

Richard Bate: Why would it be necessary to wait 18 months before free elections to be held?

Fidel Castro: Well, do you think it is good for the Cubans When all the people want peace. When all the people is that the government repair the mistakes and the barbarity of the before government. Don't you believe that our country at least one year to work? Do you believe that between... in the fight of the political parties is it possible to do anything? If we give a free election tomorrow we win because we have almost all the people ...

In Matthew 7:15-7:16 the Gospel states "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits." From the very beginning, truth has often been a casualty of the communist regime in Cuba.

Father Miguel Angel Loredo (1998)

Father Miguel Angel Loredo was a prisoner of conscience of the Castro dictatorship because he refused to go along with the lies of the regime. Father Loredo understood that one of the most formidable weapons against injustice is objective truth, and here he explained why.

"I believe we should denounce the evils of both the right and the left. I find selective denunciation, that has political roots repugnant. If you believe in the integrity of the human being you must believe deeply in objective denunciation. Without objectivity, there is no hope."

Monsignor Agustin Roman in an essay on the importance of the Cuban dissident movement in Cuba described the role that the truth played in its genesis:

The concept of nonviolent civil resistance is introduced into the history of Cuba. Take the truth as a weapon, placing it in practice in the civic field, what Scripture proposed in the spiritual realm: "the truth shall make you free". Hence its importance at that time and its transcendence for the future of Cuba.

If the truth shall make you free then what does the lie offer? The Ochoa case offers a dramatic answer. In June of 1989, General Arnaldo Ochoa is arrested. 

He had been declared a “Hero of the Revolution” by Fidel Castro in 1984 but by 1989 was deemed too dangerous by Castro because he feared that General Ochoa had been contaminated by the ideas of Glasnost and Perestroika while visiting the Soviet Union during the Gorbachev era. 

He was also popular within the ranks of the military due to his exploits in Africa. General Ochoa was accused of conspiracy and treason. He was also tied to drug smuggling and corruption. Ochoa was approached by Fidel Castro with the offer that if he confessed to everything he had been accused of and did not mount a vigorous defense that he could go home into retirement.

General Ochoa  went along with the lie and pled guilty in an abject fashion reminiscent Stalinist show trials of the 1930s. He was executed days later by firing squad on July 13, 1989, with a tainted reputation.

Father José Conrado and Father Juan Lázaro Vélez officiate at Mass for Matanzas victims.

During a special mass for the victims of the Matanzas oil fire in Miami on September 6, 2022, Father Conrado acknowledged that "although we are far from the Homeland, those of us who left to find freedom, also feel and suffer for Cuba, because the Homeland belongs to everyone" paraphrasing José Martí, the apostle of Cuban independence. Father Conrado issued a call in the name of Jesus and the Virgin "so that we Cubans break the spell of evil that has taken over the island" and for this he called for the unity of all Cubans, "those of the two shores”.

Today, the Christian Liberation Movement issued a statement underscoring its continued commitment to a free Cuba.

36th Anniversary of the Christian Liberation Movement (MCl), a time to take comfort in what we have achieved, to remember all our brothers and pay tribute to our martyrs. The path of goodness is tortuous, but it is the only possible way to achieve freedom. 

Congratulations to the MCL and all our brothers! 

Eduardo Cardet.

Today is a also good day to remember Václav Havel's hopeful call: "May truth and love triumph over lies and hatred." 

May it be so.