"The first victory we can claim is that our hearts are free of hatred. Hence we say to those who persecute us and who try to dominate us: ‘You are my brother. I do not hate you, but you are not going to dominate me by fear. I do not wish to impose my truth, nor do I wish you to impose yours on me. We are going to seek the truth together’. THIS IS THE LIBERATION WHICH WE ARE PROCLAIMING."
Oswaldo José Payá Sardiñas (2002)
Colton Carpenter's article "The Cuban Paradox" published in the Harvard Political Reviewon December 31, 2018 offers an excellent analysis on what happened with the Cuban American vote both in 2016 and 2018.
Exit polls for the greater
Cuban-American population in Florida, for example, indicate that a
disproportionate amount of Cuban-Americans supported Trump compared to
other Latino groups. While 54 percent of Cuban-Americans supported
Trump, only 35 percent of Latinos nationwide did. Similarly, in the 2018 Florida gubernatorial election, Republican Ron DeSantis won
twice as many Cuban-American votes as his Democratic opponent Andrew
Gillum. A nearly identical percentage of Cuban-Americans also chose
current Republican Gov. Rick Scott over Democrat Bill Nelson in the
Florida senate race. The Cuban vote was solidly red in 2016 and 2018
despite the trend of Latino voters being reliably blue.
Sadly, when it comes to trends and explaining how Democrats gained and lost Cuban votes over the years Carpenter's article failed to look at the policies put forward, and relied on the usual suspects who continue to argue that Cuban Americans have been assimilated and no longer prioritize U.S. - Cuba policy. Reviewing recent history provides a different picture.
Candidate Bill Clinton in 1992 ran as a "hardliner" on Cuba
policy supporting the Cuban Democracy Act also known as the Torricelli Bill. A bill that President George H.W. Bush had initially refused to sign, but
relented once Cuban exiles got Candidate Clinton's backing. As was the
case with his approach to China once he got into office Clinton did an about
face.
Congressman Robert Torricelli ( Democrat)
First, President Bill Clinton between 1993 and 1996 pursued a policy of engagement with the Castro regime. In 1994 the Clinton administration initiated regular contacts between the U.S. military and the Castro regime's military that included joint exercises at the Guantanamo Naval base. This was confirmed by Raul Castro in a December 2008 interview with Sean Penn where he stated "we've had permanent contact with the US military, by secret agreement, since 1994." Not only contacts but joint military exercises according to General Raul Castro:
"It is based on the premise that we would discuss issues only related to
Guantánamo. On February 17, 1993, following a request by the United
States to discuss issues related to buoy locators for ship navigations
into the bay, was the first contact in the history of the revolution.
Between March 4 and July 1, the Rafters Crisis took place. A
military-to-military hot line was established, and on May 9, 1995, we
agreed to monthly meetings with primaries from both governments. To this
day, there have been 157 meetings, and there is a taped record of
every meeting. The meetings are conducted on the third Friday of every
month. We alternate locations between the American base at Guantánamo
and in Cuban-held territory. We conduct joint emergency-response
exercises. For example, we set a fire, and American helicopters bring
water from the bay, in concert with Cuban helicopters.
During this period of "constructive engagement" brutal massacres of Cubans such as the July 13, 1994 "13 de Marzo" tugboat massacre and the February 24, 1996 Brothers to the Rescue shoot down took place. The shoot down
involved two planes blown to bits over international airspace by Cuban
MiGs killing three American citizens and a Cuban resident who were engaged in the search and rescue of Cuban rafters.
Since it occurred while President Clinton was seeking re-election and
his only options were to do nothing, military action, or toughen
sanctions he opted for the latter signing the Cuban Libertad Act of 1996 better known as the Helms-Burton. Once again Bill Clinton ran as a hardliner on Cuba and was rewarded with more support from Cuban Americans at the ballot box.
Clinton signs the Helms-Burton bill in 1996
However once re-elected Clinton again pursued normalized relations, despite being limited by a codified embargo that he could no longer unilaterally lift because of the Helms-Burton bill that he had signed. Bill Clinton was the first sitting president to shake hands with Fidel Castro on September 6, 2000 and one month later he signed theTrade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act (TEFRA) that opened trade
between the Castro regime and U.S. companies. Opposition in congress
led to that trade not being subsidized by U.S. taxpayers through
government backed credits ensuring that business would be cash and
carry.
This combined with the Elian episode costs Al Gore Cuban American support in 2000 and led to the loss of Florida in a tight race. Florida would remain in Republican hands when John Kerry ran for president in 2004. He had a radically anti-embargo position and did poorly with Cuban-Americans as a result.
Candidate Barack Obama courts Cuban American votes in 2008
Barack Obama as a Chicago Senator was deeply critical of the embargo on Cuba, but when he decided to run for president, he spoke at an event hosted by the Cuban American National Foundation and announced his support for the Cuban embargo in 2008 and reaffirmed this position when he ran for re-election in 2012.
Barack
Obama did not take that chance when he was running for the White House
in 2008 and 2012 on a pro-embargo on Cuba platform, but was willing to risk Hillary's prospects in 2016. To be fair Hillary Clinton also bought the conventional wisdom.
Cuba's last democratic president, Carlos Prio Socarras, was elected by
Cubans in free and fair elections on July 1, 1948 and assumed office 70
years ago today on October 10, 1948. He was not perfect, but he was
a democrat who respected civil liberties and presided over years of
prosperity and freedom for Cubans.
President Prio belonged to the Autentico Party and was succeeding Ramon Grau San Martin, another member of the same political party in the Cuban presidency. Both men respected human rights, and this was reflected by the actions taken by their diplomats at the founding of the United Nations.
Cuban diplomats invited Winston Churchill
to lunch at the Cuban Embassy in London in December of 1945 and
proposed the creation of a human rights commission for the United
Nations. Beginning in 1945 Cuba took part in the drafting of the
declaration and submitted nine proposals of which five made it into the final document.
The late Bishop Agustín Román on December 16, 2006 spoke of this chapter in Cuban history and "the important role the delegation of the Republic of Cuba to the United
Nations in 1948 in the drafting and promulgation of the Universal
Charter, particularly by Drs. Dihigo Ernesto, Guillermo Belt, and Guy Pérez-Cisneros is a historical fact."
The final draft of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 was recognized by these Cuban
diplomats as one that would have been “accepted by that generous spirit
who was the apostle of our independence: Jose Marti, the hero who -- as
he turned his homeland into a nation -- gave us forever this generous
rule: ‘With everyone and for the good of everyone.’”
On December 9, 2017 Pablo Pérez-Cisneros Barreto, the son of Guy Pérez-Cisneros y Bonnel, wrote of his father and the national legacy that is bound up in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
My late father believed that the declaration is the fruit of the
great efforts of our civilization and human progress, a unique moment in
which humanity came of age in its civic education; that it is also a
source of inspiration for the formation of today’s citizens, and not
cause for divisions among them. [...] Cuba had the distinction of being
the country that proposed the finished declaration be put up for its
final UN vote on Dec. 10, 1948. Hard to believe now but Cuba was once a
leader when it came to human rights. And it is important to note that
nine initiatives proposed in 1945’s Cuba became part of the final
declaration, and that Cuba was the country that entrusted the Economic
and Social Council of the United Nations in San Francisco to prepare the
declaration as early as 1946. The third preamble of the declaration is a
copy of one of the articles of the famed 1940 Cuban Constitution, and
Cuba had the initiative to include in the declaration the right to honor
one’s human rights and reputation, as well as protect citizens against
arbitrary government interference in their private lives. Cuba
presented the first amendment to the draft declaration which was
accepted, adding the right of citizens of any member country to follow
the vocation they choose. Cuba presented a second amendment which was
also accepted — the right of every worker to receive an equitable and
satisfactory payment for their work.
The Castro regime claims to be a nationalist regime proud of Cuba's
accomplishments, but when it comes to the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and the role played by a democratic Cuba in 1948 in its
drafting, it is silent and the document itself is banned in Cuba.
Both Carlos Prio Socarras and Ramon Grau San Martin were democrats who rejected hatred and offered a pluralistic path to governance. They were the anti-thesis of what came later. President Prio Socarras warned Cubans not to be consumed
by hatred, but his warnings were not heeded and as we approach more than six decades of dictatorship his words were all to prophetic.
Do not be
overly alarmed, however, by my words. For there is no reign of evil in
Cuba, nor is your nation governed by the violence unleashed. What I fear
is that it may be one day, because you knew how to decipher the secret
of thetimes when you warned that "whips will pick
up who sows whips" and that "the one who unleashes winds harvests storms",
and for that day of the harvest of storms and whips, you see me from now
worried.Rise up and tell the few Cubans that tend to the garden of your island, that they uproot the
poisonous flower of hatred and throw the plant into
the abysses of oblivion!*
Cuban democracy ended on March 10, 1952 with Fulgencio Batista's coup
and 68 years later it has still not returned. Sadly as the years pass
and those who lived those glory years of democracy leave us they begin
to be viewed as myth. Add to that the current dictatorship's rewriting
of history to diminish this democratic age in order to justify its own
tyrannical rule and one can understand how the world would forget Cuba's
own democratic chapter.
Carlos Prio, Ramon Grau, Carlos Hevia: Three Cuban presidents
Yet there is one witness who spoke out on behalf of the Republic on
October 16, 1953 that the tyranny cannot ignore: Fidel Castro. During
his trial for the July 26, 1953 armed assault on the Moncada Barracks he
addresed the court and described Ramon Grau's and Carlos Prío's
presidencies:
Once upon a time
there was a Republic. It had its Constitution, its laws, its freedoms, a
President, a Congress and Courts of Law. Everyone could assemble,
associate, speak and write with complete freedom. The people were not
satisfied with the government officials at that time, but they had the
power to elect new officials and only a few days remained before they
would do so. Public opinion was respected and heeded and all problems of
common interest were freely discussed. There were political parties,
radio and television debates and forums and public meetings. The whole
nation pulsated with enthusiasm. This people had suffered greatly and
although it was unhappy, it longed to be happy and had a right to be
happy. It had been deceived many times and it looked upon the past with
real horror. This country innocently believed that such a past could not
return; the people were proud of their love of freedom and they carried
their heads high in the conviction that liberty would be respected as a
sacred right. They felt confident that no one would dare commit the
crime of violating their democratic institutions. They wanted a change
for the better, aspired to progress; and they saw all this at hand. All
their hope was in the future.
President Carlos Prío Socarras
and his wife Mary Tarrero de Prío went into exile in Miami, but his
struggle for a democratic Cuba did not end there. He would be arrested on more than one occasion accused of smuggling arms to rebels in Cuba seeking to overthrow Fulgencio Batista.
According to Ramón L. Bonachea and Marta San Martin in their book The Cuban insurrection, 1952-1959
in August of 1956, Fidel Castro and Carlos Prío met at a small hotel in
McAllen, Texas where for over an hour they discussed the future of the
insurrection against Batista. Castro asked Prío for money and the former
president agreed to finance Castro’s expedition to Cuba. Prío would
send the Cuban guerrillas almost one quarter of a million dollars in
arms and money. Prío got other associates to contribute thousands of
dollars more in cash to the guerrillas.
President Harry Truman shakes hands with President Carlos Prio
On June 11, 1961 Carlos Prío Socarras addressed 1,200 Cubans in exile and pledged to aid the Cuban underground. He would go on to aide and plan efforts to combat Castro's military dictatorship as he had done earlier against Batista.
As the 1960s drew to a close and the armed struggle against Castro's dictatorship drew to a close Carlos Prío in 1973
sought to preempt efforts at a negotiated solution in which democratic
Cubans were not participants boldly proposing that Cuban exiles seek to
insert themselves in the dialogue taking place between Nixon and
Breshnev and negotiate the island's future. The proposal was met with
wariness and opposition going no where.
Carlos Prío Socarras died from a self-inflicted gun shot wound on April 5, 1977 in his garage in Miami.
Carlos Prío from his youth battling the Machado dictatorship as a
University student in the 1930s to his later struggles against Batista
in the 1950s and Castro in the 1960s and 70s he spent a life struggling
against dictatorships of all ideological tendencies. Seeing the
destruction of Cuba and the suffering of the Cuban people led him to despair.
First Lady of Cuba: Maria Dolores Tarrero de Prío
The last First Lady of a free Cuba, Maria Dolores "Mary" Tarrero de Prío died in Miami on September 23, 2010 and was laid to rest on September 25, 2010. She was the widow of Carlos Prío Socarras, the last democratically elected president of Cuba. She was buried alongside her husband.
Seventy years after he became Cuba's last democratic president, part of Carlos Prio's legacy lives on in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and his own example of civility and the defense of freedom of expression during his presidency. These are values that deserve to be honored and a legacy to be both respected and defended.
*"No te alarmen en exceso, sin embargo, mis palabras. Pues no hay reino de
la maldad en Cuba ni tu pueblo está regido por la violencia desatada. Lo que
temo es que pueda estarlo un día, porque tu supiste descifrar el secreto de
los tiempos cuando advertiste que «fustas recogerá quien siembra fustas» y que
«el que desata vientos cosecha tempestades», y por ese día de la cosecha de
tempestades y de fustas, me ves desde ahora preocupado. Levántate y diles a
los pocos cubanos que cuidan en el jardín de tu isla la venenosa flor del
odio, que la arranquen de raíz y arrojen la planta a los abismos del olvido!"