"Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good." - Rom. xii. 21.
One hundred years ago this month on August 4, 1914 World War I began, a conflict that destroyed Western Civilization, out of which emerged empowered the toxic ideologies of Communism and Nazism. This conflict paused between 1918 and 1939 only to explode again in September 1939 in what became known as World War II and is viewed by some academics as a continuous process. Today, the peoples of the West are living in the ruins of a once great civilization after what some have described as a wasted century.
The weight of this history fills one with sadness. However, at the same time one must not despair remembering while there is life there is hope and that Martin Luther King Jr. was right, we do have a choice between nonviolence and nonexistence.
The above mentioned southern civil rights leader and decades earlier the Indian national independence leader Mohandas Gandhi demonstrated that nonviolence could confront and overcome powerful governments such as the United States and the British Empire without firing a shot.
|First World War (1914 - 1918) Salt March (1930)|
This is not pacifism or passive aggressiveness but rather nonviolent resistance to evil and injustice. In the run up to World War II in many quarters passivity was practiced before the great evils of Communism and Nazism. There is nothing passive about nonviolent resistance or pacifism.
The best manner to confront and defeat evil is not denouncing or destroying one's adversary but producing and preserving that which is true and having a constructive program. On September 11, 1906 in South Africa, as part of a contest, Mohandas Gandhi coined the term Satyagraha which translates into English literally as "holding firmly to truth."
Nonviolent resistance calls for having an aggressive attitude in confronting injustice while at the same time refraining from hating your enemy or seeking to do them or their property harm.
Martin Luther King Jr. listed the six principles of nonviolence that remain relevant today:
The struggle for civil rights in the United States demonstrated the superiority of nonviolent resistance over violent resistance. The early and sustained successes of the nonviolent civil rights movement contrast sharply with the failed and sterile violence of the later black power movement.SIX PRINCIPLES OF NONVIOLENCE
Fundamental tenets of Dr. King’s philosophy of nonviolence described in his first book, Stride Toward Freedom. The six principles include:
(1.) Nonviolence is not passive, but requires courage;
(2.) Nonviolence seeks reconciliation, not defeat of an adversary;
(3.) Nonviolent action is directed at eliminating evil, not destroying an evil-doer;
(4.) A willingness to accept suffering for the cause, if necessary, but never to inflict it;
(5.) A rejection of hatred, animosity or violence of the spirit, as well as refusal to commit physical violence; and
(6.) Faith that justice will prevail.
On the international front beginning in 1989 with the freedom of Poland, the Velvet Revolution in the Czech Republic, the tearing down of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Soviet Union in 1991 were all achieved through mass movements that nonviolently resisted brutal and violent regimes.
The First World War was claimed to be the "war to end all wars" but should have been called "the war to debase human life" and found new lows in the gulags, death camps, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Despite the century of horror unleashed by this conflict the twentieth century was not a wasted century because nonviolence was able to demonstrate in high profile and well documented instances throughout that century around the world in India, the United States, the Philippines, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Lithuania, Estonia, Russia, Chile and many other places.
In Cuba nonviolent exemplars demonstrated that it was possible to live the life of a free individual under the most extreme totalitarian regime
In these uncertain times nonviolence is more relevant than ever and its study is needed to confront and transform violent and unjust regimes. At the same time nonviolent art and imagery is desperately needed in this world bombarded with extreme and violent images.
The choice to embrace nonviolent resistance as a method to confront and defeat evil is a development critical for the survival of the human race and will conclusively demonstrate that the 20th century was not a waste of time, lives and a prelude to extinction. It comes down to a question of non-violence or non-existence: civic resistance or nuclear holocaust.