Showing posts with label migrants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label migrants. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Regional human rights organization concerned about Cubans in Colombia near the border with Panama

 Surge in Cubans fleeing the Castro regime contributes to crisis in Colombia on the border with Panama.

IACHR Deeply Concerned about the Situation of Migrants in Colombia Close to the Panama Border

August 8, 2016

Washington, D.C. - The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) expresses its deep concern regarding the extreme vulnerability of some 1,300 migrants who are stranded in the Colombian town of Turbo, near the Darien Gap, Colombia, close to the border with Panama. Among the migrants are men and women, including pregnant women, as well as children, including newborns. Most of the migrants come from Cuba and Haiti, along with others from African and Asian countries, and are headed to the United States. 
 
According to publicly available information, the migrants who have made it to Turbo have reached Colombia via different routes—through Venezuela, Ecuador, Guyana, or Brazil—so as to then continue their journey to the United States, passing through Central American countries and Mexico. The situation of the migrants stranded in Turbo has been exacerbated by the closure of the border and the tightening of immigration controls by Panama on May 9, 2016. The IACHR welcomes the information sent by the State that there have not been detentions of irregular migrants because this practice is not legal in the country.

According to a population survey by the Colombian Human Rights Ombudsman’s Office, as of July 28, 2016, there were 1,273 Cuban migrants in vulnerable circumstances in the town of Turbo, including nearly 300 children. According to the Colombian State, the Ministry of Health and the Colombian Family Welfare Institute has been providing special attention to women and children. The Ombudsman’s Office reported that the main human rights concerns have to do with the migrants’ living quarters, problems with access to food, the risk of contracting diseases, and the potential for becoming victims of human trafficking.

According to the information presented by the State, there has been a promotion of voluntary exit of migrants from Colombian territory and through this mechanism, more than 600 migrants in irregular situation have left the country using a travel document. On this matter, the IACHR reiterates that before promoting a voluntary exit, it is the obligation of the State to identify migrants who have special needs of protection, such as asylum seekers and refugees, persons subject to complementary protection, victims of human trafficking, among others, and to adopt the measures needed for their protection.

The Commission has received information indicating that the migrants, faced with a lack of legal and safe migration channels, are turning to clandestine routes and channels, in which they are vulnerable to abuse and extortion by criminal organizations, traffickers of migrants, and some police. Moreover, there have been incidents in recent years in which migrant boats have sunk while trying to reach Panama from Colombia, resulting in migrant deaths and disappearances. On January 11, 2016, the Colombian authorities reported that a boat transporting 24 African migrants sank in the Gulf of Urabá; nine of the migrants were rescued by authorities.

The Commission has also received information regarding the dangers of death and abuse faced by migrants who have set out through the jungle region of the Darien Gap, where armed groups operate. Migrants who have traveled that route reported that they had endured inhumane conditions on the journey through the jungle and had walked by the bodies of migrants who had died and others who had suffered serious injuries and bone fractures. The Commission has also received information regarding rapes and acts of sexual violence, as well as robberies, physical blows, and extortion by traffickers of migrants and in some cases even by members of the police. The Colombian State informed it has created a unified command center that coordinates, develops and evaluates the activities of the authorities to answer to the situation, with the participation of several national and international bodies.

In keeping with Colombia’s international human rights obligations, the Commission calls on the Colombian State to implement any measures necessary to protect the life, integrity, and security of all migrants under its jurisdiction. The effective guarantee of the right to life requires the State to adopt prevention, protection, and assistance measures when it is aware of situations of migrants in danger. The State should also adopt measures to guarantee the rights to due process and judicial protection in the context of immigration proceedings, the right to family unity, the right to seek and receive asylum, the principle of non-refoulement, and the prohibition on the collective expulsion of foreign nationals. In addition, States should adopt the necessary measures to prevent and punish any abuses that individuals and State authorities may commit against migrant persons.

In the wake of the announcement by Colombia’s immigration agency, “Migración Colombia”, that it was beginning deportations of the migrants in Turbo, the IACHR reiterates that, in keeping with international norms and standards, immigration proceedings—especially those that could lead to deportation—must analyze, establish a basis for, and decide individually on each case, and must respect minimum guarantees. These include migrants’ right to be heard by the relevant authority in the context of the deportation proceedings and to have sufficient opportunity to exercise their right to a defense; the right to interpretation and translation; the right to legal representation; the right to consular protection; the right to receive notification of a deportation order; access to an effective remedy to appeal a deportation decision; the right to appeal a deportation decision; and the right to suspension of deportation while the matter is under appeal.  The State reported that to date has not been filed any remedy against the deportations. Based on the above and the extremely vulnerable situation of these migrants, the Commission notes that these people are in Turbo, a remote area of the country, and that the State should take steps to effectively implement the right to have a remedy to appeal the deportation decisions.

“The fact that migrants are turning to irregular channels and to traffickers is explained by the absence and shortage of legal and safe migration channels. We call on the American States to take immediate action to open up channels that allow these people to migrate legally and safely,” said Commissioner James Cavallaro, President of the IACHR. To that end, States can make use of programs such as humanitarian admission programs, family reunification visas, student scholarships, labor mobility programs, private sponsorships, and refugee resettlement programs.

A principal, autonomous body of the Organization of American States (OAS), the IACHR derives its mandate from the OAS Charter and the American Convention on Human Rights. The Inter-American Commission has a mandate to promote respect for human rights in the region and acts as a consultative body to the OAS in this area. The Commission is composed of seven independent members who are elected in an individual capacity by the OAS General Assembly and who do not represent their countries of origin or residence.

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Regional human rights group calls attention to detentions/deportations of Cubans in Ecuador

Cubans arbitrarily detained in Ecuador and deported back to Cuba.

39 detained Cubans filed for an appeal, but unclear whether it'll be respected. (Actualidad Radio)

IACHR Expresses Concern Regarding Detentions and Deportations of Cuban Migrants in Ecuador

July 26, 2016

Washington, D.C. — The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) expresses its concern regarding the alleged eviction and arbitrary detention of nearly 150 people in Ecuador, as well as the alleged deportation of 121 Cuban migrants. The IACHR calls on the Ecuadorian State to adopt any measures that may be necessary to guarantee that all rights of migrant persons are respected, in particular their right to liberty, personal integrity, due process, and judicial protection, the right to seek and receive asylum, the principle of non-refoulement, and the right to family unity.

According to publicly available information, on July 6, 2016, the National Police of Ecuador, as part of a migration control operation, cleared out a camp that had been set up in Parque El Arbolito, in Quito. The eviction was reportedly carried out without warning, and a number of individuals said that they had been victims of acts of physical and psychological aggression and that their belongings had been confiscated. As a result of this operation, nearly 150 people—including children, adolescents, pregnant women, and elderly adults—reportedly were detained and transferred to a prison facility and an immigration detention center.

In addition, according to publicly available information, deportation hearings were held on July 7 and 8 at a court for minor offenses and juvenile offenders in Pichincha (Unidad Judicial de Garantías Penales, Contravenciones y Menores Infractores). According to Ecuador’s Interior Ministry, “of the first group of citizens of Cuban origin who attended the hearings, eight were released because they were part of a family unit, in other words, because they have Ecuadorian children. However, they should fix their immigration situation in order to obtain legal status in the country. Twenty-two individuals were released because they provided justification for their lawful stay in Ecuador.” A number of sources indicate that deportations of asylum seekers and refugees had been ordered. In addition, the Ombudsman’s Office of Ecuador expressed concern over the submission of such judicial decisions regarding deportations to a new, administrative jurisdiction, a situation that contravenes the principle of judicial independence.

According to information from the Ministry of the Interior, on July 9 the first group of 29 Cuban migrants were deported; on July 11 another 46 migrants were deported; and on July 13 a third group, for a total of 121 Cubans deported. According to publicly available information, the deportees were not properly notified of their deportation orders, and the time frames available to appeal these decisions had not been respected.

In keeping with its international human rights obligations, the Ecuadorian State should adopt all measures that may be necessary to ensure that racial profiling is not applied in the context of migration control operations. The State has a general obligation to respect all rights of migrant persons, including their right to live free of discrimination and free of all forms of violence and their right to personal integrity, personal liberty, family unity, and property.

The Commission observes with concern that the information it has suggests that the Ecuadorian State has made use of automatic immigration detention without first resorting to alternative measures. In that regard, the Commission calls to mind that immigration detention must be an exceptional measure, used only as a last resort and for the shortest period of time possible. In addition, when migrant persons are detained, States should adopt the necessary measures so that those who are detained have sufficient information regarding the nature of their detention, the reasons for it, the procedural guarantees or safeguards to which they are entitled, and the remedies available to appeal or challenge their detention. Moreover, States may not resort to immigration detention of children and their parents as a precautionary measure to protect the goals of an immigration process or procedures to determine refugee status.

The IACHR reiterates that, in keeping with international norms and standards, immigrants subject to proceedings that could lead to deportation must be afforded minimum guarantees. These include: (i) the right to be heard by the relevant authority in the context of the deportation proceeding and to have sufficient opportunity to exercise their right to a defense; (ii) the right to interpretation and translation; (iii) the right to have legal representation; (iv) the right to consular protection from the moment of detention; (v) the right to receive notification of a deportation order; (vi) access to an effective remedy to appeal a deportation decision; (vii) the right to appeal a deportation decision; and (viii) the right to suspension of deportation while the matter is under appeal.

The Commission calls to mind that the Ecuadorian State has the obligation to analyze, establish a basis for, and decide individually on each deportation that is carried out. At the same time, the Commission reiterates that the State has the obligation to respect the principle of non-refoulement and therefore not to deport to another country, whether or not it is the person’s country of origin, any foreigner whose rights to life, personal integrity, or personal liberty may be at risk of being violated. The principle of non-refoulement is the fundamental standard of protection of asylum seekers and refugees.     

A principal, autonomous body of the Organization of American States (OAS), the IACHR derives its mandate from the OAS Charter and the American Convention on Human Rights. The Inter-American Commission has a mandate to promote respect for human rights in the region and acts as a consultative body to the OAS in this area. The Commission is composed of seven independent members who are elected in an individual capacity by the OAS General Assembly and who do not represent their countries of origin or residence.

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Hunger strike and boycott demanding Cubans held in the Bahamas be treated decently

Jesus Alexis Gomez has been on hunger strike since July 19, 2013 and was joined on Friday July 26, 2013 by Ramon Saul Sanchez after Bahamian officials failed to follow through on a verbal agreement by placing it in writing. There is an online petition directed at the United Nations and also a campaign underway to boycott the Bahamas. Below is an essay by Rosa María Payá Acevedo that outlines what is being done to Cubans under custody of the Bahamian authorities. 

Ramon Saul Sanchez (Left) and Jesus Alexis Gomez (Right)

Categories of Human Beings
By Rosa María Payá

Where are the documentaries about the Bahamian concentration camps where there are school-age children and women with their lips sewn shut?

It has been a few weeks since South Florida’s media and social networks have been denouncing the systematic abuses to which refugees from Cuba and other nations are subjected in the Bahamas. The trigger was a series of clandestinely made cellphone videos that showed officers kicking people and subjecting them to different tortures. Those who made the videos public assure these were taken in the refugee detention camps in Nassau, and even when people have recognized their friends and relatives in the videos, the Bahamian Chancellery has denied that these are authentic.

These detention centers seem to be the scene of systematic human rights violations, but they are not a new phenomenon. The oldest data I know of refers to the New York Times of August, 1963, which discusses the intervention of Cuban air and naval forces in the former British island during which 19 refugees were kidnapped and taken back to Cuba. But even more astonishing is the reaction of the international community before a situation that has been taking place for years, and for which there are not many echoes beyond the modest ones from the voices of Cubans and Cuban Americans.

In the past 20 years, there is no trace of these events in two of the most important American newspapers, even when the Interamerican Human Rights Commission (IACHR) has issued reports thereon from allegations dating from 1998. For its part, the Spanish newspaper El País lists the names of the two Caribbean islands when it comes to hurricanes while other Iberian newspapers only mention them to highlight the progress of the oil drilling carried out in collaboration with Cuba.

The reaction is different when it comes to the equally unjust humiliations suffered by the prisoners at the U.S. Naval Base in Guantánamo. The acts of condemnation in this case reach high political dimensions including the Human Rights Commission of the Russian Chancellery, the Swiss President of the International Committee of the Red Cross, the United Nations, the American Catholic Church, some leftist French party and thousands, perhaps millions of people from around the word who are in favor of the closing of this prison in the easternmost end of Cuba.

However, curiously enough, in that very end of my country the Provincial Prison of Guantánamo, run by Cuban authorities, is known for its inhumane treatment, the lack of hygiene, a poor diet and occasional beatings to which the people who are surviving there are subjected to. Most of the country’s prisons are run in similar conditions.

It would seem as if the men in orange uniforms held at the naval base belonged to a different category from that of the non-uniformed emigrants of the Caribbean. One hypothesis could be that the people of the Middle East evoke greater sympathy or compassion than the Caribbean people, but since it is precisely in that region where countless human rights violations have been committed in the past and continue to be committed to this day by the authorities of those countries, and the international condemnation has historically suffered its ups and downs, this argument doesn’t hold water. It would be scandalous if the level of the scandal was related to the category of the oppressors.

It is not the US Marines who are torturing Cubans and Haitians in the Bahamas; it is not “the Yankee empire” against “the oppressed people of the world.” Therefore, the perception is that the abuses committed by the authorities of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas are less attractive to the international community.

I cannot help questioning the motivations of the forces behind these reactions. If it is not compassion for those who are suffering, a sense of justice and respect for international treaties, could it be that the level of solidarity is determined by the unpopularity of the oppressor? Doesn’t the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaim that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights? A world in which lobbies have the last say and pressure groups have more interests than convictions is scary.

Who is lobbying for our brothers whose rights are violated with the same impunity in Havana and Nassau? Where are the documentaries about the Bahamian concentration camps where there are school-age children and women with their lips sewn shut? Where is the absolute condemnation for the humiliations that these people who emigrate suffer from, which are not subjected to any accusations? Why throughout the 20 years this situation has been taking place has it not become popular among youth to favor the closure of the prison camps in the Bahamas?

Apparently, the sense of impunity is contagious, and the Bahamian officials feel they can beat Cubans in the same way in which the repressive bodies of the State Security in the Largest of the Antilles have no mercy toward opposition members. Each of them should know that impunity is not sustainable over time, and that time is running out.

6 July 2013