Saturday, February 6, 2021

Remembering Reagan on the 71st anniversary of his 39th birthday: What he did to end tyranny in Cuba

Ronald Wilson Reagan born 110 years ago today on February 6, 1911.

Ronald Reagan was born 110 years ago today in Tampico, Illinois on February 6, 1911. Today, at the Reagan Library the Reagan Foundation broadcast an online celebration observing the 40th President's birthday with a wreath laying ceremony at his tomb. Moments like these give one time to reflect.

My earliest political memories dimly recalled Nixon, and Ford but more complete memories began with the Carter Administration, and the dramatic change that occurred with President Reagan's administration from the afternoon of January 20, 1981 to the morning of January 20, 1989.

In my first year at Florida International University, I had joined the College Republicans, and at the age of 19 on June 29, 1988 at the Omni International Hotel to support the Senate candidacy of Connie Mack an event was held were I was able to meet and listen to President Ronald Reagan, and came away deeply impressed. He gave a wide ranging speech that included foreign policy and meeting with Cuban- American leaders, and he spoke truths that still resonate and hold true today. Below is an excerpt from the speech.

"And let's talk for a moment about foreign policy. Let me offer here a simple, straightforward message: No more Vietnams, no more Nicaraguas, no more Bay of Pigs. Never again! Connie Mack and I stand with the Nicaraguan resistance. We will not rest until we've won for them the full support they need and until they've won for themselves the genuine democracy and freedom for which they've so bravely struggled. By supporting courageous freedom fighters around the world, we're shining a light on the path out from Communism, and nowhere has that light shone brighter than in Afghanistan. And isn't it time we apply the lessons of Afghanistan in Nicaragua and show the same commitment to freedom fighters in our own hemisphere as we do to others in distant lands?

I just came from a meeting with Cuban-American leaders, and I want to tell you what I told them. In Communist Cuba, a man like Armando Valladares is considered a criminal. In the United States, we're honored to have him represent our nation before the world. In Communist Cuba, a man like Ramon Puig is labeled an enemy of the Government. In the United States, he's a respected citizen and a hero. And while Havana spreads communism, terror, and death in Central America, many Cuban-Americans like Dr. Manuel Alzugaray are providing food, medicine, and humanitarian assistance to the victims of Communist aggression.

So, yes, there is an unbridgeable gulf between the Governments of the United States and Cuba; it is the gulf between freedom and tyranny. And as far as this administration is concerned, freedom for Cuba, liberty for her people, is a nonnegotiable demand. And so long as Cuba remains an inhuman Communist dungeon, so long as it exports terrorism and revolution in the Western Hemisphere; has some 60,000 military, secret police, and other personnel propping up brutal Communist dictatorships around the world; and, yes, so long as Cuba is used as the personal instrument of Fidel Castro's violent anti-Americanism -- there cannot and must not be any normalization of relations with Cuba."

Critics of Reagan's policy on Cuba have to downplay both its concrete actions and achievements.

Ronald Reagan entered the White House in 1981 and re-imposed the Cuba travel ban, toughened economic sanctions undoing Jimmy Carter's detente with Fidel Castro, in 1982 placed the Castro regime on the list of state sponsors of terrorism, and started Radio Marti to break through the communist monopoly with uncensored information for Cubans on the island. 


President Reagan was an unapologetic anti-communist who empowered dissidents and engaged in acts of solidarity to underscore their importance.

Ronald Reagan backed the creation of a Radio Free Cuba to break Castro regime's information monopoly over Cubans beginning in 1981. In a 1983 address, President Reagan explained the importance of getting the truth to oppressed peoples:

The Soviets are terrified of the truth. They understand well and they dread the meaning of St. John's words: "You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." The truth is mankind's best hope for a better world. That's why in times like this, few assets are more important than the Voice of America and Radio Liberty, our primary means of getting the truth to the Russian people.[...]  We've repeatedly urged the Congress to support our long-term modernization program and our proposal for a new radio station, Radio Marti, for broadcasting to Cuba. The sums involved are modest, but for whatever reason this critical program has not been enacted. Today I'm appealing to the Congress: Help us get the truth through. Help us strengthen our international broadcasting effort by supporting increased funding for the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty, and by authorizing the establishment of Radio Marti.

He signed it into law in October 1983. When it finally went on the air full time in 1985 Radio Free Cuba had come into existence named Radio Marti. This radio station transmitting uncensored information to Cuba marked a before and after inside the island nation. At the time President Reagan hoped that Radio Marti would ''help defuse the war hysteria on which much of current Cuban Government policy is predicated.'' The Hoover Institution in 1989 listed it as one of a 100 conservative victories.

The State Department placed Cuba on the list of state sponsors of terrorism on March 1, 1982 because of the dictatorship's involvement in cocaine trafficking and arms smuggling to communist guerrilla groups in Colombia.

The Reagan Administration pursued engagement both with the Castro regime and the Cuban people, and unlike others, before and after, did not confuse the two. Reagan tasked Ambassador Vernon Walters as his special envoy, sending him in 1982 to meet for six hours with Fidel Castro in Cuba. As was the case with the Soviet Union, the Cuban counterparts took part in a frank discussion that did not sugarcoat the nature of their regime.

25 years after the Castro regime came to power on January 5, 1984 President Reagan addressed the Cuban people over Radio Marti, in its early broadcasts. Below is the message he delivered.

“On behalf of the people of the United States, I would like to extend New Year’s greetings to the people of Cuba.

We know you’re marking a historic anniversary on your island. Twenty-five years ago, during these early January days, you were celebrating what all of us hoped was the dawn of a new era of freedom. Most Cubans welcomed the prospects for democracy and liberty which the leaders of the Cuban revolution had promised.

Such a free and democratic Cuba would have been warmly welcomed by our own people. We’re neighbors in a hemisphere that has been characterized by the quest for human freedom. Government which rests upon the consent of the governed is a cardinal principle that enshrines the dignity of every individual. We share many of the same ideals, especially a common longing for a world of peace and justice. We are both proud peoples, proud of what we’ve achieved through our own efforts.

But tragically, the promises made to you have not been kept. Since 1959 you’ve been called upon to make one sacrifice after another. And for what? Doing without has not brought you a more abundant life. It has not brought you peace… It has not won freedom for your people – freedom to speak your opinions, to travel where and when you wish, to work in independent unions and to openly proclaim your faith in God…

In the meantime, over half a million of your fellow citizens have migrated to the United States, where their talents and hard work have made a major contribution to our society. We welcomed them and we’re proud of their success. But we have to wonder: what would Cuba’s economy be like today if those people had been allowed to use their great talent, drive and energy to help you create prosperity on your island?

The most important question remains: Where is Cuba heading? If it were heading towards greater welfare and freedom for your people, that would be wonderful. But we know prisoners of conscience, convicted for their political activities, have been languishing in Cuban prisons, deprived of all freedom for nearly a quarter of a century…

You may not be aware of some of these things… That’s because you are systematically denied access to facts and opinions which do not agree with your government’s official view. But why are your leaders so unwilling to let you hear what others think and say? If the power of truth is on their side, why should they need to censor anyone’s views? Think about that…

The objective of the Radio Martí program will be simple and straightforward: tell the truth about Cuba to the Cuban people. We want you to know what you haven’t been told…

These are not pleasant questions but they deserve answers. I hope you’ll contemplate them with care. At the beginning of this new year, let us hope that the future will be kinder than the past. And may that better future begin soon for all you in Cuba.

Feliz Año Nuevo y que Dios te bendiga [Happy New Year and God bless you].

The Reagan Administration did not stop there, but named former Cuban prisoner of conscience Armando Valladares Ambassador to the United Nations Human Rights Commission and made human rights in Cuba a priority. Reagan presented an interim report to members of the Cuban American community.

The end result was that for the first and last time Amnesty International, the International Committee of the Red Cross and the UN Human Rights Commission were able to visit Cuban political prisoners, and assess the human rights situation in the country.

In the 1987 documentary Nobody Listened, directed by Néstor Almendros and Jorge Ulla the world was introduced to Ricardo Bofill, one of the founders of the Cuban human rights movement, and the nonviolent human rights movement overall on the big screen. Dr. Bofill is interviewed and discusses his circumstances as a dissident in Cuba engaged in the battle of ideas:

"I can't understand the hatred towards me. Because, really in the only field I’ve done battle, is the field of ideas. In this field I’ve had no response just prison and the police. And I don’t know why because the revolution controls all mass media. They have editorials, journalists, even many writers in the world. I don’t know why the response, time and again, has been jail. The response should come in the field I fight in, with ideas. I was arrested again in 1983. On that occasion, I was sentenced to 17 years in jail accused of activities in the Cuban Committee for Human Rights and the last period of prison began. For reasons of health and others I know not of in 1985 I was placed in the status I’m now in which is “conditional liberty with restriction of movement.”

Fidel Castro was asked the name of the human rights defender in another interview. The Cuban dictator dismissed his importance, but it is obvious in the context of his answer that he knew very well who this lone activist was, and viewed him as a threat.

President Ronald Reagan received Dr. Ricardo Bofill in Nov 1988.

In 1988 Ricardo Bofill was forced out of the country by the dictatorship, but continued his human rights work from exile in Miami, while Gustavo Arcos remained and continued to represent the movement in Cuba. In late November 1988 he was being received by President Ronald Reagan in the White House.

These are a just a few of the reasons that Cuban Americans fondly remember the 40th President of the United States, and continue to honor his memory.


 

Thursday, February 4, 2021

Look closer at Havana: Biden administration should take its time in formulating an effective Cuba policy

South Florida Sun Sentinel, February 3, 2021

Look closer at Cuba

Fidel Castro in Addis Ababa with Mengistu Haile Mariam in 1977.

William M. LeoGrande makes a number of claims that do not stand up to closer scrutiny. [”Biden should act fast on Cuba | Opinion,” Jan. 28] He called President Obama’s 2014 opening “a historic achievement.” The opening was followed by a collapse in U.S. trade with Cuba, a historic increase in repression against Cuban dissidents, and beginning in November 2016, American diplomats suffering brain injuries. The cause, according to the National Academies of Sciences, is “consistent with the effects of directed, pulsed, radiofrequency energy.”

Mengistu visits Cuba in Havana,Cuba on May 1, 1978.

 LeoGrande’s claim that engagement with Cuba “was necessary for ending the conflict in southern Africa in the 1980s” fails to mention that the collapse of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s drove the end of conflict in southern Africa with the end of Soviet subsidies. It was not the good offices of the Castro regime. 

The professor ignores the role played by the Castro brothers in the late 1970s and early 1980s in Ethiopia, sending thousands of Cuban troops to assist war criminal Mengistu Haile Mariam carry out a genocide that claimed over a million Ethiopian lives. When formulating policy it is important to provide full context. The Castro regime has been and continues to be a bad actor, and belongs on the list of state terror sponsors.

The Biden administration should take its time in formulating an effective policy.

John Suarez, executive director, Center for a Free Cuba

https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/letters/fl-op-letters-panhandling-homeless-fort-lauderdale-20210203-m4vfnrmhbvclnbotlmt6ry4gle-story.html

 

Saturday, January 30, 2021

73 years ago today Mohandas Gandhi was assassinated

"We are ruthless and ask no quarter from you. When our turn comes we shall not disguise our terrorism." - Karl Marx, Marx-Engels Gesamt-Ausgabe, vol. vi pp 503-5 (The final issue of Neue Rheinische Zeitung, 18 May 1849)

 “In politics you cannot follow nonviolence. You cannot follow honesty. Every moment you have to give a lie. Every moment you have to take a bullet in hand and kill someone.” -  Gopal Godse,  co-conspirator in Gandhi's assassination, Time Magazine, February 2000.


"Terrorism and deception are weapons not of the strong but of the weak." - Mohandas K. Gandhi


Body of Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi lies in state at Birla House in New Delhi.
Seventy three years ago Mohandas Gandhi was shot three times in the chest and killed by a Hindu nationalist at 5:17pm. 
 
Gandhi despite his successful struggle for independence and the establishment of the largest democracy on the planet was felled, after repeated assassination attempts they gunned him down as he went to worship. They murdered the independence leader because they did not believe that India could survive with Gandhi promoting Satyagraha and a Muslim state next door. Gopal Godse, a co-conspirator and brother of the assassin Nathuram Godse, argued as late as February 2000 in a Time magazine interview that: “In politics you cannot follow nonviolence. You cannot follow honesty. Every moment you have to give a lie. Every moment you have to take a bullet in hand and kill someone.”
 
The nationalists were open and transparent about their evil intent, but the communists had more guile, and their reasons for rejecting him more complex. 
 
The Soviet press published an article written by S.M. Vakar in 1948 following Gandhi's assassination on January 30, 1948 titled "The Class Nature of the Gandhi Doctrine" subtitled "Gandhi as a Reactionary Utopian" in the Soviet philosophy journal Voprosy filosofii (Questions of Philosophy). The Marxist Leninist argument was outlined as follows:
Although Gandhi regarded the union and independence of the Indian peoples as his goal, his reactionary-Utopian social theory and the reformist methods of struggle connected with it caused his activity to fail in facilitating overthrow of the colonial yoke [...] The social essence of the Gandhi doctrine and its fundamentally reactionary role in the history of India's national liberation movement has hardly been treated in Marxist literature. Yet this doctrine still retards the development of class awareness among the Indian masses.
What was this social essence of Gandhian thought that so troubled the Marxist Leninists in the Soviet Union? First, the reformist methods of struggle referred to in the above quote was nonviolent resistance and secondly his social theory rejected class struggle as another manifestation of destructive violence. On September 11, 1906 a new word came into existence that would give a better understanding of Gandhi's social theory and method of struggle which he described as:
'Satyagraha.' Truth (Satya) implies love, and firmness (agraha) engenders and therefore serves as a synonym for force. I thus began to call the Indian movement 'Satyagraha,' that is to say, the Force which is born of Truth and Love or non-violence, and gave up the use of the phrase 'passive resistance,' in connection with it, so much so that even in English writing we often avoided it and used instead the word 'Satyagraha' itself or some other equivalent English phrase.
The Marxist-Leninists embraced revolutionary violence and a movement led by a small vanguard of intellectuals and professional revolutionaries that would carry out the changes necessary by whatever means necessary and rejected nonviolence as naive. They followed the doctrine of Lenin as presented in his 1902 revolutionary tract What is to be done.


Over a century has passed since both sets of ideas have been set out and applied around the world. An analysis done by Maria J. Stephen and Erica Chenoweth systematically explores the strategic effectiveness of both violent and nonviolent campaigns using data on 323 campaigns carried out between 1900 and 2006.[1] There findings demonstrate that major non-violent campaigns were successful 53% of the time versus only 26% for major violent campaigns and terrorist campaigns had a dismal 7% success rate.
Today, India with all its flaws is the world's largest democracy with a growing economy that presents new competitive challenges to the developed world and Marxist-Leninism has amassed a body count of 100 million dead and counting. It would appear that Gandhi's criticisms of the communists were prescient:
"The socialists and communists say, they can do nothing to bring about economic equality today. They will just carry on propaganda in its favor and to that end they believe in generating and accentuating hatred. They say, when they get control over the State, they will enforce equality. Under my plan the State will be there to carry out the will of the people, not to dictate to them or force them to do its will." - Mohandas Gandhi

"It is my firm conviction that if the State suppressed capitalism by violence, it will be caught in the coils of violence itself, and will fail to develop non-violence at any time. The State represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but as the State is a soulless machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence." - Mohandas Gandhi
It is Satyagraha that is relevant today in 2021 and offers an alternative to the conflagrations suffered in the 20th century and the wars that plague the world now. Gandhi's Satyagraha is a call to principled non-violence but even pragmatists and realists looking over the historical record cannot fail to be influenced by the fact that non-violent civic resistance works and in the aggregate offers a better chance of a better life for more people.

Below is a German documentary about the assassination of Mohandas Gandhi.



[1]Stephan, Maria J. and Chenoweth, Erica Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. International Security, Vol. 33, No.1 (Summer 2008), pp. 7-44

[2] Gandhi, Mohandas (author) Dalton, Dennis (editor) Mahatma Gandhi: Selected Political Writings September 1996 Hackett Publishing Company
 

Friday, January 29, 2021

Remembering Cuban martyr and dissident Harold Cepero on what would have been his 41st birthday

"Whoever destroys a single life is considered by Scripture to have destroyed the whole world, and whoever saves a single life is considered by Scripture to have saved the whole world." - Mishnah  (1135-1204)

Harold Cepero Escalante

Harold Cepero Escalante was born in Ciego de Avila on January 29, 1980 and was murdered by the Cuban dictatorship together with Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas in Bayamo, Granma on July 22, 2012. Harold was a member of the Christian Liberation Movement and a youth leader. Harold understood that those who engaged in repression were also not free stating "[t]hose who remove and crush freedom are the real slaves."

Today would have been his 41st birthday, but thanks to the Castro regime's secret police his life was ended eight years ago at the age of 32.

Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas and Harold Cepero Escalante

Harold understood the dangers of advocating for freedom in Cuba under the Castro dictatorship. In 2012, shortly before his death he explained the cost of resistance: "Christians and non-Christians who have the courage and the freedom to consider the peaceful political option for their lives, know they are exposing themselves to slightly less than absolute solitude, to work exclusion, to persecution, to prison or death."

This courageous young man is remembered and the demand for justice continues The petition demanding an international investigation into the circumstances of Harold and Oswaldo's killing on July 22, 2012 has crossed 10,000 signatures.

Thursday, January 28, 2021

José Julián Martí Pérez at 168: The heirs of José Martí and those who repress them now

"I think they kill my child every time they deprive a person of their right to think." - José Martí


On the eve of the 168th anniversary of the birth of José Julián Martí Pérez, better known as José Martí, approximately 20 artists, journalists and intellectuals gathered to read some of his works.

January 27th marked the two month anniversary of hundreds of artists and intellectuals protest at the Ministry of Culture on November 27, 2020 for freedom of expression following the government raid on the San Isidro Movement's headquarters in Havana hours earlier. Out of that gathering, the Vice Minister of Culture agreed to meet with 32 representatives, and out of that encounter committed to an ongoing dialogue. On that night the 27N movement was formed, and this is how they described what took place next. 

"The dialogue that began that night and to which both parties committed themselves in the meeting held between the Vice Minister of Culture Fernando Rojas and 32 representatives of those more than 300 protesters, was abruptly broken on December 4, 2020 with the publication by the MinCult of his statement "Those who asked for dialogue break the dialogue." The institution not only broke the dialogue, but absurdly blamed its counterpart. But the 27N had already been born, and it did not die there nor has it died. It continued to demand dialogue from the only space that power has left it: social networks. A dialogue that is with power, but it is also with all of Cuba.

José Martí was born on January 28, 1853 and in addition to being a journalist, poet, and independence leader he was also a fervent defender of freedom of expression and conscience.

Cubans of all ideological stripes claim him as their own, but objectively who has maintained the spirit of his words and ideas? There is a movement in Cuba that seeks to restore human rights and liberties using nonviolent means. There are courageous men and women who risk everything standing up to dictatorship. Many have been jailed and some of them have been killed in the process and their families targeted for reprisals.

José Martí  wrote that "There is no forgiveness for acts of hatred. Daggers thrust in the name of liberty are thrust into liberty's heart." He also criticized the writings of Karl Marx, observing they were antithetical to his own values. Marx in 1849 had written, "We are ruthless and ask no quarter from you. When our turn comes we shall not disguise our terrorism." 

It is not a surprise that Martí saw the dangers inherent in Socialism and its doctrine of envy observing: "Socialist ideology, like so many others, has two main dangers. One stems from confused and incomplete readings of foreign texts, and the other from the arrogance and hidden rage of those who, in order to climb up in the world, pretend to be frantic defenders of the helpless so as to have shoulders on which to stand." 

Following these statements to his modern day counterpart over a century later leads one to Oswaldo Paya, addressing the European Parliament on December 17, 2002:

 "The first victory we can claim is that our hearts are free of hatred. Hence we say to those who persecute us and who try to dominate us: ‘You are my brother. I do not hate you, but you are not going to dominate me by fear. I do not wish to impose my truth, nor do I wish you to impose yours on me. We are going to seek the truth together.’"

It also leads to #27N and the San Isidro Movement, and the artists, journalists and intellectuals peacefully gathered in front of the Ministry of Culture to read the works of José Martí on January 27, 2020. They are is heirs. One of them Carolina Barrero, an art historian, led the group in the reading of the poem "Dos Patrias" which translates to English to "Two Homelands," and posted the video on Facebook. Other heirs, are to be found in Cuban diaspora, one of them is Patiño Vázquez, a self described "Cuban-American child of mambo and rock & roll." He created his own arrangement, a musical setting for this work of poetry.

Two Homelands

By José Martí

I've got two homelands: Cuba and the night.

Or are both the same? As soon as 

the sun withdraws its majesty, with long veils

and holding a carnation, silent,

Cuba, like a sad widow, appears in front of me

I know which bloody carnation trembles in her hand! 

My chest is empty, it is torn and empty where the heart used to be. 

It's time to start dying. The night is right to say good-bye. 

The light disturbs and the human word. 

The universe speaks better than (the) man.

Like a flag that invites you to battle, the red flame of the sail flatters. 

I open the windows, already tight inside of me. 

Muted, breaking the carnation's leaves, like a cloud that blurs the sky, 

Cuba, a widow, passes... 

In 2021 the heirs of Martí are repressed by the Castro dictatorship that systematically denies freedom of speech and assembly, but claims the poet as their own. Ideas expressed below by José Martí are in conflict with Castroism and cannot be reconciled. However they are in accord with the democratic Cuba that helped draft the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, and struggled for a more just and democratic order, but was systematically destroyed by Fidel and Raul Castro beginning on January 1, 1959. 

"Man loves liberty, even if he does not know that he loves it. He is driven by it and flees from where it does not exist."

"Freedoms, like privileges, prevail or are imperiled together You cannot harm or strive to achieve one without harming or furthering all."

"Liberty is the right of every man to be honest, to think and to speak without hypocrisy."

"It is the duty of man to raise up man. One is guilty of all abjection that one does not help to relieve. Only those who spread treachery, fire, and death out of hatred for the prosperity of others are undeserving of pity."  

These views exist today in Cuba, but not in the regime, but among the dissidents defying the communist regime and embracing freedom while rejecting hatred. How did the Castro dictatorship respond to this peaceful gathering? 

Preemptive arrests, an act of repudiation against gathered artists and intellectuals, the Minister of Culture Alpidio Alonso and his Vice-Minister Fernando León Jacomino, caught on camera physically assaulting nonviolent demonstrators, and the dissidents arrested and crammed into a small bus by secret police and beaten up while already detained, reported Diario de Cuba.

 The human rights organization, Cubalex, over Facebook published and compiled a list of those dissidents detained yesterday and those still missing or jailed at the time of their report.

#List of persons detained today in front of the Ministry of Culture in Cuba, after being assaulted by functionaries with violence.
*If you have information on others detained, you can leave them in the comments please.
 
1 Héctor Luis Valdés Cocho reporter
2 Chino Novo
3 Ulises Padrón  LGBTI activist
4 Yunier Gtiérrez, reporter La Hora de Cuba
5 Solveig Fong
6 Julio Llopiz, artist
7 Maykel Osorbo, rapper and San Isidro member
8 Nelson Julio Álvarez, reporter ADN
9 Miryorly García
10 Mijail Rodríguez
11 Camila Ramírez Lobón, artivist
12 Eliexer Márquez
13 Henry Eric Hernández
14 Víctor Alfonso
15 Carolina Barreiro
16 Celia González
17 Oscar Casanella
18 Ismario Rodríguez Pérez, photo journalist Periodismo de Barrio
19 Mauricio Mendoza, journalist Diario de Cuba
20 Sider Riverí
21 Alfredo Martínez, reporter of Tremenda Nota
 
Arrested and freed
1 Camila Acosta
2 Amaury Pacheco
3 Tania Bruguera
4 Katherine Bisquet
5 Oscar Casanella
 
Missing
1 Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara
 
With homes under surveillance
1 Michel Matos
2 Iliana Hernandez
3 Luz Escobar
4 Adrián Rubio
5 Anyell Valdés